WHOOOOA !! That some SCARRY STUFF !!
Greta and AOC be shakin in their boots huntin them some Cows !!😫😫
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
Actually... it IS based on your graphic.
If you look at the temperature scale, the one 2nd from the right shifts up a little bit, but the one on the far right shifts up even more.
What your graphic shows (if the temperature scale is left steady) is that average global temperature has increased by roughly 2 deg.F since 1988. That's a LOT.
I don't think it's true and I believe the data is seriously manipulated... but this graphic should be tossed in the dumpster.
So many margins for error. What was the accuracy of a thermometer 50 or 100 years ago? Were they calibrated to any standard at all?
Odds are what was an open field 100 years ago may now be in the middle of a busy city. So many variables. Weather is not random; it is chaotic; which is why the BEST computers made cannot predict the weather with any accuracy more than 72 hours into the future
Yet, we are to believe the forecast 10, 50 or 100 years out is not to be questioned. The global warming fanatics have not gotten one prediction correct yet
You would need to take accurate temperature measurements in order to get meaningful temperature measurements.
For example....do they record these measurements on exactly the same day? What are the weather conditions? Where are the thermometer s located?
If they contend that CO2 will trap more sunlight, then places which see a higher CO2 concentration....like major cities....should see higher temperatures than rural areas.
Still have left out the Volcanoes