What did he just give the kid?
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (161)
sorted by:
There's an interpretation that is most likely when acknowledging that any other consideration suggesting otherwise is a complete stretch of "splitting hairs".
Mine requires simple observation.
The others require mental gymnastics.
You can continue to waste your time staring at pixels if you want.
How about you make the "simple observation" that in the third image you can see his left hand emerging from behind the girl's arm just below her elbow while he's still holding the mask in view with his other hand. The emerging object doesn't exist in either of the previous 2 shots and lines up nicely with his hand in the fourth shot.
You seem more interested in being right than finding the truth. And come across as a "deboonker" and "Science™" type telling us the "official" stance.
Being right than finding truth? That describes you. I’m interested in objective truth. Idk what that piece of meat in those few pixels are and neither do you. You should quit pretending you’re right and care about the truth.
Lol classy. Hit me with the old "no u".
keep puffing your chest, I guess...
Your interpretation is that he wadded up something in the mask, which remained in his left hand to be passed to the boy, correct? What do you suppose the black object which is labeled "mask" in the images is? You can see in the images that it's slowly moving down and left, while the emerging left hand is quickly moving down and right.
I really don’t care to argue anymore what we think a blurred low res image is. I stated what was obvious from what can be absolutely determined. You wanna pretend you know what a few blurred pixels are. I’m not even here to argue about such a waste of time.