I think this whole exchange just got out of hand, all they are arguing about is a number "6 million Jews" and whether it's real or not, rebel news hosts being jewish are obviously going to defend that number as that's what they've been taught, they could have just agreed to disagree and moved on but both of them got butt hurt and triggered and ended the interview.
rebel news didn't censor or interrupt him and let him make his argument, both sides look bad after that argument probably because humans are just emotional retards generally, I wouldn't make much of that exchange other than a miss understanding from both parties.
Bothe Ezra and David kept saying that they just wanted Chris to have an opportunity to clarify his position and clear up any confusion. So that's what Chris did, but David kept trying to "correct" him. That's not reporting.
Nah david was just trying to provide the counter arguments that people make so he could make his argument to dispute them, only when they got the "6 million" question did david get emotionally attached and persist that chris was wrong, not the best journalism but it's still journalism, it happens all the time, you just move on to the next question at that point and let the viewers make up their own minds, just because the interview devolved into a debate on 1 question doesn't mean you need to walk out and shit talk each other.
Clash of 2 personalities disagreeing on contentious subject:
suborn(david) vs sensitive(chris)
I disagree with you. Journalists, reporters, etc. are supposed to just report. When they try to correct they are entering into "opinion piece" territory. They can do that without a guest and just state their position. They were not allowing Chris to state and maintain his opinion.
I think this whole exchange just got out of hand, all they are arguing about is a number "6 million Jews" and whether it's real or not, rebel news hosts being jewish are obviously going to defend that number as that's what they've been taught, they could have just agreed to disagree and moved on but both of them got butt hurt and triggered and ended the interview.
rebel news didn't censor or interrupt him and let him make his argument, both sides look bad after that argument probably because humans are just emotional retards generally, I wouldn't make much of that exchange other than a miss understanding from both parties.
Bothe Ezra and David kept saying that they just wanted Chris to have an opportunity to clarify his position and clear up any confusion. So that's what Chris did, but David kept trying to "correct" him. That's not reporting.
Nah david was just trying to provide the counter arguments that people make so he could make his argument to dispute them, only when they got the "6 million" question did david get emotionally attached and persist that chris was wrong, not the best journalism but it's still journalism, it happens all the time, you just move on to the next question at that point and let the viewers make up their own minds, just because the interview devolved into a debate on 1 question doesn't mean you need to walk out and shit talk each other.
Clash of 2 personalities disagreeing on contentious subject: suborn(david) vs sensitive(chris)
I disagree with you. Journalists, reporters, etc. are supposed to just report. When they try to correct they are entering into "opinion piece" territory. They can do that without a guest and just state their position. They were not allowing Chris to state and maintain his opinion.