....this is silly.
Abortion is not the same thing as contraception.
I'd MUCH rather the soeam not meet an egg and this prevent impregnation rather than folks lining up to murder babies.
But also
Roe v wade is about medical privacy not simply abortion.
There is nothing wrong with contraception, its a way to not get pregnant when you dont want or cant afford. Contraception should be the first avenue if you dont want to get pregnant. Not just expect abortion to be that.
I don't see the conflict here. Pregnancy prevention is better than abortion. Abortion should be an absolute last resort (eg. life of mother is at risk if brought to term, pregnancy via rape/incest etc.).
Maybe we shouldn't "cum" at all unless we want a child. Maybe there's a reason sexuality is being pushed so hard, taught in kindergarten etc. Why do nuns, priests and serious followers of all faiths of the world go with abstinence? What happens spiritually when we orgasm?
How many of those abstinent priests are later outed on Grindr or turn out to be child molesters? When the occasional nun gets pregnant do you assume immaculate conception? It's more that there's a code of silence going on, you can only suppress base urges so much and it doesn't turn out healthy for most people.
You can have a romantic partner and sexual intimacy without lust or orgasming, is what I am proposing. Lust is the root of all suffering. I am saying that there is something sacred about sexual energy that shouldn't be wasted because it can be transformed - harnessed. It is not just a physical act, but a spiritual one and as you can feel a short moment of physical bliss (orgasm), that same energy when conserved, brings about spiritual bliss.
There is a difference between love lust and sex.
You clearly conflate sex with lust.
Lust is most certainly not the root of all evil. That is ridiculous.
The only root to evil is fear+disconnection from God >period<.
Everything that leads down the road to darkness is rooted in fear, but it is the turning from God(which is love) which is where they evil takes hold.
I agree that sex is a spiritual act or it is supposed to be. Still, different than reproduction purposes.
YOU stated that sex=making children only.
Yes, you can have a romantic non-sexual partner. Once again I ask- should a married couple who can no longer bear children not have sex? Should they spend a life with someone they wanted to share their whole self with without physical intimacy because they are "useless non-breeders" essentially?
Having an orgasim is momentary....but you say that as if that in and of itself makes it sinful. So....kissing is sinful, holding hands, a hug?....
Don't get it twisted.
Just because they dark has CORRUPTED something sacred that doesn't mean that something sacred is the thing that is sinful.
Like everything, we are bid to honor God and ourselves (as the image of God) and conduct ourselves accordingly. Forcing someone to have sex with you to make a baby is more sinful than having sex with your partner that your love knowing you are not going to get pregnant. But in your thinking the former is more desirable than the later because your emphasis is on (as you put it so crudely) "cumming."
God as not anti sex or anti intimacy.
The Song of Solomon is literally a biblical romance novel.
Please answer.
-old couple, no sex?
-barren people, no sex?
-physical disabilities, no sex?
....this is silly. Abortion is not the same thing as contraception. I'd MUCH rather the soeam not meet an egg and this prevent impregnation rather than folks lining up to murder babies.
But also
Roe v wade is about medical privacy not simply abortion.
And also based upon a great big lie that was later admitted to.
Contraception as in prevention, is not evil.(imho) Using abortion as a means of birth control, is.
There is nothing wrong with contraception, its a way to not get pregnant when you dont want or cant afford. Contraception should be the first avenue if you dont want to get pregnant. Not just expect abortion to be that.
I don't see the conflict here. Pregnancy prevention is better than abortion. Abortion should be an absolute last resort (eg. life of mother is at risk if brought to term, pregnancy via rape/incest etc.).
Also Steve Bannon doesn't have full control of the commercials, his show isn't the only one on that network.
says the one that didn't end up on the sheets...
Maybe we shouldn't "cum" at all unless we want a child. Maybe there's a reason sexuality is being pushed so hard, taught in kindergarten etc. Why do nuns, priests and serious followers of all faiths of the world go with abstinence? What happens spiritually when we orgasm?
How many of those abstinent priests are later outed on Grindr or turn out to be child molesters? When the occasional nun gets pregnant do you assume immaculate conception? It's more that there's a code of silence going on, you can only suppress base urges so much and it doesn't turn out healthy for most people.
Chi/prana is powerful. Sex is sacred and is purposely bastardized by the dark esp via p orn.
So with your proposal. Those who can't have children shouldn't have sex?
So a woman hits menopause her husband can have sex but she shouldn't.
Or barren/sterile adults shouldn't experience a sexual partnership?
That's ridiculous.
Also priests and nuns swear a vow...that doesn't mean they are all celibate. And not every religious sect has that as a tenant.
It is about honoring your body and taking responsibility for your ability to crest and care for life....
Not orgasiming.
You can have a romantic partner and sexual intimacy without lust or orgasming, is what I am proposing. Lust is the root of all suffering. I am saying that there is something sacred about sexual energy that shouldn't be wasted because it can be transformed - harnessed. It is not just a physical act, but a spiritual one and as you can feel a short moment of physical bliss (orgasm), that same energy when conserved, brings about spiritual bliss.
There is a difference between love lust and sex. You clearly conflate sex with lust. Lust is most certainly not the root of all evil. That is ridiculous.
The only root to evil is fear+disconnection from God >period<.
Everything that leads down the road to darkness is rooted in fear, but it is the turning from God(which is love) which is where they evil takes hold.
I agree that sex is a spiritual act or it is supposed to be. Still, different than reproduction purposes.
YOU stated that sex=making children only.
Yes, you can have a romantic non-sexual partner. Once again I ask- should a married couple who can no longer bear children not have sex? Should they spend a life with someone they wanted to share their whole self with without physical intimacy because they are "useless non-breeders" essentially?
Having an orgasim is momentary....but you say that as if that in and of itself makes it sinful. So....kissing is sinful, holding hands, a hug?....
Don't get it twisted. Just because they dark has CORRUPTED something sacred that doesn't mean that something sacred is the thing that is sinful.
Like everything, we are bid to honor God and ourselves (as the image of God) and conduct ourselves accordingly. Forcing someone to have sex with you to make a baby is more sinful than having sex with your partner that your love knowing you are not going to get pregnant. But in your thinking the former is more desirable than the later because your emphasis is on (as you put it so crudely) "cumming."
God as not anti sex or anti intimacy. The Song of Solomon is literally a biblical romance novel.
Please answer. -old couple, no sex? -barren people, no sex? -physical disabilities, no sex?