That is all
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
No, it doesn't. What it reveals is that the age of the earth is not in serious dispute at the moment by people who understand what science is about. It's in dispute by people who use a literal interpretation of the Bible to date the earth instead of relying on actual methodologies that have proven accurate for decades.
Current methodologies are always subject to challenge, using further experimentation, data collection, reporting of results, and replication, which is part of the scientific method I explained to you earlier.
There are a lot of things not "in serious dispute" at all times that are absolutely wrong. Seeing as you do not understand this, I'll just stop talking to you.
How's that read, ya prick
Ah yes, the ad hominem attack, the pinnacle of scientific discourse.
Dismissed.