Here's your red pill for the day. Pass it on to your acquaintances, there are plenty to go around.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC525089/
https://www.nature.com/news/2005/050110/full/050110-3.html#ref-CR1
https://www.pnas.org/content/102/3/797
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3335060/
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21645515.2016.1177688?scroll=top&needAccess=true
You are correct, but I doubt you know by how much.
Claims they have "isolated" Sars-CoV-2 are false.
They used a computer model they purchased from the Chinese that has been in use using since the original SARS was isolated to perform all these studies. They only modified a few proteins they deemed "most likely to change in nature" in their process feeds.
No animal studies, to date, have included the Sars-CoV-2 virus. All studies prior to 2020 have used the previous model. All past 2020 that do include animals, if they exist at all, have not been published, so no formal records can be cited.
Even the "vaccines" are built on this model. If they made the assumption that the Sars-CoV-2 virus occurred naturally, on top of using an outdated model of the original SARS virus, the will fail to account for the gene editing done in the Wuhan Lab.
Summarily, the "vaccines" cannot and will never were able to treat the actual virus because their models are inherently flawed due to being based on what is effectively an entirely different virus AND not accounting for genes edited by Wuhan mad scientists.