How many vaxt can both read and have access to the internet? Does personal responsibility ever kick in? Trump can't hold everyone's hand forever. It's an intelligence test. Those who decide to inject an experimental bio weapon lose. The surviving population will be smarter.
I would agree however children are at the mercy of their parents and that is a dangerous ass game to play. War isn't pretty so maybe it needs to be this extreme but I have to think there is a better way?
Agreed. Vaxing children is a crime against humanity. My point is the people have to stop it -- we cannot depend on politicians. That's actually DJT's point too.
If Trump had denied the vax, he'd be gone, and we'd still be in lock down with mandatory jabs. The goal is to minimize casualties and win -- just like all wars. That means some people are going to die. At least they had access to the info they needed.
Unless we're just watching a movie, 45,000+ American civilians have died so far from a jab that they were told was safe by our President. He even said at one point that "Everyone should take it." He has only VERY recently made a statement that kids don't need it. Even that was tepid when you consider that it is dangerous for children to take it.
What he did in endorsing what he must have known was a toxin is indefensible UNLESS he had the military switch out the toxic vaccines for placebos. That seems impossible given what we are seeing from public testimony about vaccine injury and death and the blood results of the vaxxed through a microscope but it is possible, I suppose, that the deaths and injuries from the vax are not real and part of the movie designed to expose what is going on.
I don't agree that everyone has had access to the info to give an informed consent. Even people who think they gave informed consent likely did not have the information we do that made us say no.
How many vaxt can both read and have access to the internet? Does personal responsibility ever kick in? Trump can't hold everyone's hand forever. It's an intelligence test. Those who decide to inject an experimental bio weapon lose. The surviving population will be smarter.
I would agree however children are at the mercy of their parents and that is a dangerous ass game to play. War isn't pretty so maybe it needs to be this extreme but I have to think there is a better way?
Agreed. Vaxing children is a crime against humanity. My point is the people have to stop it -- we cannot depend on politicians. That's actually DJT's point too.
When Trump took his oath of office vowing to protect and defend American lives, was it limited to only the intelligent members of the population?
Maybe Trump will be "the first arrest" that shocks the world. That would definitely do it.
If Trump had denied the vax, he'd be gone, and we'd still be in lock down with mandatory jabs. The goal is to minimize casualties and win -- just like all wars. That means some people are going to die. At least they had access to the info they needed.
Unless we're just watching a movie, 45,000+ American civilians have died so far from a jab that they were told was safe by our President. He even said at one point that "Everyone should take it." He has only VERY recently made a statement that kids don't need it. Even that was tepid when you consider that it is dangerous for children to take it.
What he did in endorsing what he must have known was a toxin is indefensible UNLESS he had the military switch out the toxic vaccines for placebos. That seems impossible given what we are seeing from public testimony about vaccine injury and death and the blood results of the vaxxed through a microscope but it is possible, I suppose, that the deaths and injuries from the vax are not real and part of the movie designed to expose what is going on.
I don't agree that everyone has had access to the info to give an informed consent. Even people who think they gave informed consent likely did not have the information we do that made us say no.