Good To Know!
(media.gab.com)
Comments (9)
sorted by:
They can't even tell the RTA and suicide victims from Covid deaths. Cash bonuses help them decide.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7023a3.htm
CDC admission the Delta Variant "outbreak" is not a measure of sick patients confirmed positive for this particular strain, but a statistical model.
If you follow links on the CDC website, these are non peer-reviewed classifications and definitions: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/variant-info.html
Ok so this is not true.
The PCR test exclusively tests for Sars-Cov-2 and does not test for flu. They are making a test that can do different strains of flu and Sars-Cov-2 within the same test.
Currently if you want to test someone for flu and Sars-Cov-2 you have to use multiple tests. They are just inventing a test that can do everything at once.
That said, the PCR test is manipulated by running to excessively high cycle threshold which gives majority false positives and is used to drive hysteria in the media. Also, Sars-Cov-2 is treatable with existing therapies and there was no legal justification or necessity to rush a "vaccine."
But it is false to say it cannot distinguish between flu or Sars-Cov-2.
Thank you for bringing this up. Everyone has taken this idea and run with it without paying attention to what the CDC actually said.
funny, because the CDC website says, exactly the opposite of your point.
Directly says : " CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. "
This basically says the current PCR testing can't tell the difference, and that's why they recommend other methods.
Is that not what they're saying here, or again, are we all missing something?d
And, if that IS true, explain to us how they figure out 'variants'. Seeing as how they're saying the PCR can't tell the difference - how could you even detect a variant of Virus A, if you can't differentiate between Virus A or Virus B?
A "multiplexed method" is one that can test for two things in one (hence multiple). What they're saying is they would like to have a test that can tell if you have covid and if not, is it the flu or is it neither. Current tests can only test for one at a time.
Ok so expand your thinking a little bit.
"CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses."
This is not implying that the current tests are unable to distinguish from Sars-Cov-2 and influenza; this is saying that they are encouraging laboratories to use newer, multifaceted tests which can detect Sars-Cov-2 and/or influenza in the same test.
Let me give an example. I recently did a home test for Sars-Cov-2 and it was basically you gather the sample yourself and stick it into a perforated cardboard sheet and drip some stuff on it from a dropper that comes with the test. Then you close the cardboard sheet and wait 15 minutes and it's like a pregnancy test where it gives you one line or two lines or whatever for positive or negative.
Imagine if it just had a few more boxes where lines would appear that would say influenza A or B or whatever, and you can test multiple things with one test. That is basically what they developed.
Their statement doesn't imply the test I was using didn't know if I had flu or Sars-Cov-2. It just meant that I tested for Sars-Cov-2 and got either a positive or negative, and it said bupkis about the flu because it didn't test for it. Now they have more complex tests which can distinguish just like in my example, so they are saying laboratories should move towards those tests instead. It saves time and materials so that you don't have to have inventory of all these different types of tests.
I know so badly we want to believe that this whole virus shit is bullshit, and for the most part it is, but we don't need to misrepresent stuff to make our point.
I'm actually on the fence about it being totally fake.
We've got report from Wuhan confirming gain of function - would make it real
We've got CDC flip flopping every other day - seems like they don't really know
China went right back to normal after about a month We know they've gone all over the board about cycling.
There definitely IS something. Whether it IS just the flu rebranded, or an actual newer SARS virus that isn't as deadly as some flus - on the fence.
Again, I don't believe it's fake, but I'm not 100% convinced it's not a regular flu bug they've fucked around with.
It's definitely real. Even the whistleblower doctors agree that there is something out there. It's definitely not deadly unless you have several health issues. In the UK they released data that 2/3 of the deaths are people with 6+ pre-existing conditions. Only 0.9% of the deaths are people with no pre-existing conditions.
The media has 100% bullshitted this to crash economies.
Here is an interesting video on it: https://www.bitchute.com/video/YodXrZGxb4Hw/
Also check out https://www.youtube.com/peakprosperity this guy's perspective has 180'd since the beginning of the whole charade and he is pretty objective when it comes to it and so I trust him to be truthful.