Just a short discussion about WuFlu...
Here is a short discussion of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) to give some background:
-
COVID Diagnosis with PCR | Misinterpreting results | Cycle threshold explained (11min) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_1Z8cSXI-Q
-
Kary Mullis discusses the PCR Test (3min...Note: Dr. Mullis invented the PCR test for which he received a Nobel Prize) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ueVTcOSD1k
-
For further Reading: https://old.abmgood.com/marketing/knowledge_base/polymerase_chain_reaction_introduction.php
The above leads me to believe that the RT-PCR is a wonderful diagnostic tool. However, when abused for political or financial (or both) purposes, it becomes useless in its intended employment. As referenced in #1 above, proper cycling of this test to be effective in tracing WuFlu in a population should be 20-30 cycles. Oregon used 35-40 (most labs 38-40), Washington used 43 cycles. This produced quite a few "false positives".
Another problem with this testing is that it does not differentiate COV-2 from other Corona viruses such as bird flu, Hong Kong Flu, SARS, MERS, or "normal" seasonal influenza. With the high cycle rate, the common cold and dead fragments of a myriad of viruses produce positive results.
Now, how about profit?
Pfizer has vastly exceeded its Covid-19 vaccine sales forecast of $15bn, and now expects the jab to bring in $26bn of revenue in 2021 – an increase of 73% https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/features/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-revenue/
J&J’s pharmaceutical business, which developed the single-shot Covid vaccine, generated $12.59 billion in revenue, a 17.2% year-over-year increase. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/21/johnson-johnson-jnj-earnings-q2-2021.html
Moderna had earnings of $1.2 billion, or $2.84 per share, in the first quarter of 2021. This is compared to a loss of $124 million, or 35 cents per share, in the first quarter a year ago. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/moderna-reports-17-billion-in-covid-19-vaccine-sales-posts-first-profit-ever-2021-05-06
The FDA, CDC, Media and Politicians Receive Money from Vaccine Makers. (a quick overview) https://childrenshealthdefense.org/vaccine-secrets/video-chapters/the-fda-cdc-media-and-politicians-receive-money-from-vaccine-makers/
I wonder how many people would have rushed out to get a vaccine if there wasn't a "WORLDWIDE PANDEMIC" that was a "GLOBAL HEALTH EMERGENCY".
OK, how about that pesky testing thing. First, notice the dates of the following 2 articles.
George Soros And Bill Gates’ Backed Consortium To Buy U.K. Maker Of Covid Tests For $41 Million (Jul 19, 2021) https://www.forbes.com/sites/daviddawkins/2021/07/19/george-soros-and-bill-gates-backed-consortium-to-buy-uk-maker-of-covid-lateral-flow-tests-for-41-million/
07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html
Could those two events possibly be coincidental? No way...Soros and Gates are known around the globe for their philanthropy. It couldn't possibly be connected to a profit motivation. Those two individuals are even known to be quite generous via their charitable activities through their donations to the FDA, CDC, and even the WHO (World Health Organization). Just remember, "IT'S FOR THE CHILDREN".
The cheapest vaccine in the US used to be $15. So, 8 billion people with one shot each is $120 billion. Keep multiplying that up for repeat shots and boosters etc.
Also, Soros and Gates have just bought a company that makes tests. Within days we are being told that the PCR test is not sound. Also, some of us may need to test several times a week from now on.
Profit motive? You are pulling my leg ...!
Perhaps you are referring to (from the above):
George Soros And Bill Gates’ Backed Consortium To Buy U.K. Maker Of Covid Tests For $41 Million (Jul 19, 2021) https://www.forbes.com/sites/daviddawkins/2021/07/19/george-soros-and-bill-gates-backed-consortium-to-buy-uk-maker-of-covid-lateral-flow-tests-for-41-million/
07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html
This was the report I saw.
I thought I addressed that above. What I wrote was: "Another problem with this testing is that it does not differentiate COV-2 from other Corona viruses such as bird flu, Hong Kong Flu, SARS, MERS, or "normal" seasonal influenza. With the high cycle rate, the common cold and dead fragments of a myriad of viruses produce positive results."
So, are we violently agreeing or what?
It’s always about the money.
Kary Mullis said that PCR was NOT a diagnostic tool. It is a replication tool pure and simple.
Foa a test, you ideally want a yes/no type of answer and PCR does not do that. It just replicates whatever there is and someone has to draw a line and say above that level you are positive and below that line you are negative.
We now know that the CDC did not actually calibrate the tests using COVID-19 so the lines are being drawn for something else!
I was under the impression that it could be used to detect very small amounts of viral load which SHOULD be used with other tests such as a full DNA panel to further isolate contagions. Of note, he developed the test for research into the HIV virus.
When used PROPERLY, it could be ONE tool in a diagnostic regimen.
I do agree with your statement with that taken in to account.
Yes, it can detect small amounts of anything but it has no way of determining whether what it has found is active or not. That is, it cannot tell the difference between someone who had the virus some time ago or whether it is new. That is compounded by the fact that it is not looking for the virus! It is just lookng for things that some people thought might be associated with the virus.
Perhaps, you could read the whole thing.