But the fact that we have zero long-term data and that even without the corruption going on there is a non-zero chance that it could wipe out all of humanity.
It doesn't matter how infinitesimally small that probability is.
That is simply not a gamble worth taking, no matter how high the risk of a real pandemic would be.
Freedoms can be restored, at a price. Humanity can not if 100% of the population got vaccinated and it then turned out as terminal.
Which makes you no different from a headline reading libtard.
I quote:
I was making a case against the mandatory vaccination. But since you're too arrogant and impulsive and instead of listening pretend that you are capable of reading minds you have demonstrated why the elites are capable of dividing us.
Good job.
sorry about your faulty start to your point, I don't have time to read everything. I read the first paragraph, so I'm not reading headlines, and you didn't write in a way that compelled me to go any further and I told you why. I was being nice. no need to be wordy, freedom and liberty, period.
If you don't have the time to read don't talk. You can't read minds.
Your attitude is the exact problem that caused the situation that we're in.
I didn't say I don't have time to read, I said I read the first paragraph and made a decision not to waste my time reading your piece any further, I don't have time to read everything. Maybe go back and re-write it in a more presentable way to make the read thought provoking and entertaining to some degree. too many words and time wasted on your poorly written piece.
Your excuses don't matter.
In the time you've spent on vomiting all over this thread you could've read it and realized that I've made the strongest possible case against mandatory vaccination.
Instead you've demonstrated your arrogance, ignorance and complacency all in one.
To be fair the main bodybdidnt support your own premise so he really didn't need any more than the title. You are the guy that made your statement so definitive. "Single most important" based on that I think you are wrong.
Yes, he did need more than the title. Neither of you have demonstrated this not to be the case.
We have managed to restore liberty and end tyranny multiple times throughout history.
I'd love to see humanity recover if 100% of the population gets vaccinated and the 0.00000....0001% chance event of humanity going entirely extinct takes place.
Please, try and demonstrate how a redeemable scenario is worse than a literal dead end.