My Thoughts on Durham
It is my personal belief that at some point, the military will intervene in national politics and allow Donald Trump to resume his duties as POTUS. Some would call such action a military coup, but that will likely prove to be an incorrect description.
If evidence proves that China hacked the election and facilitated Biden's victory over Trump, it would be tantamount to an act of war. The removal of Biden by the military would not be a "military coup." It would be the removal of a hostile regime illegally installed by a foreign government.
If the military does intervene, it logically follows that they would assist President Trump in putting things back in order. One task would be the clean up institutional corruption, some of which is being investigated by John Durham.
I have no reason to question Durham's integrity. I do not doubt that he has made great progress in his investigation of government corruption. Devin Nunes and Kash Patel have both hinted that Durham's work may be wrapping up soon. I hope they are right. But if they are not, it doesn't matter to me.
My working hypothesis is that the justice system itself is corrupt. That includes the DOJ, FBI, and the courts. It's possible that Durham may have empaneled grand juries in red states, rather than in DC, where political figures would receive favorable treatment. It's possible that jury trials could be held in those states. But if my hypothesis is correct, and if the military will be responsible for addressing the problem of corruption, I would assume the prosecution, wherever appropriate, would be handled by the military under the UCMJ.
Some will point out that the military does not have jurisdiction over the prosecution of civilians, and that is true, but if martial law is declared, all prosecution falls under the jurisdiction of the military.
Martial law can be declared in a small region. Imagine for instance, how many politicians could be prosecuted under the UCMJ if martial law were declared (at least initially) only in Washington DC.
If Durham drops the hammer, that's great. But I'm not worried if he doesn't, because I believe a much bigger plan is in place to deal with institutional corruption.
1 question: If military doesnt have jurisdiction over the prosecution of civilians, what about tribunals, prosecuting for treason, crimes against humanity? I would trust military over federal judges or SCOTUS.
I also want to add: Read the Law of War.
Just find a topic of interest, or a section that sounds like it would have the answer to your question, and start reading.
This is how I found the McAfee comms.
Lindsey Graham specifically asked this question to Brett Kavanaugh during his SCOTUS nomination process. There’s already legal precedent to prosecute any citizen as an “enemy combatant” via the military if their treasonous actions dictate so.
If that traitor asked the question it was to figure out a way to save his own hide. He needs to be one of the first to hang with all the shit he did with John McCain.
After foreign intervention is proven, and they already have that (AZ/all audits are a partial show for normies and to instill fear in DS IMO plus to get accurate ballot count), then the chessboard changes so to speak. Consult Majic Eyes Law of War analysis to get the gist of it.
President Trump amended the manual for courts martial in 2018 to expand the people eligible for courts martial to include civilian government employees who engage in bad behavior with enemies of the state. They also amended the section of the UCMJ that deals with recording people sexually and forced prostitution.
The people that mentioned the enemy combatant status of traitors are correct, but most of you do not understand a very important key point. Under martial law, all civilian branches of government are suspended and replaced by military law and governance.
EVERYONE can be prosecuted by the military under martial law, regardless of status.