The militia IS supposed to be the guard of a free state.
But what dejure has been setup, has been defacto altered.
This defacto situation, when kept going long enough may then be perceived as something that is dejure.
defacto and dejure are two different animals.
This is the real meaning of : We ave you a republic (dejure), if you can keep it (defacto).
I should add though, that defacto laws have been put on the books operating in such a way that the intended use of 2A has become a catch-22. Hence, the push to frame it in terms of hunting.
I would disagree.
The militia IS supposed to be the guard of a free state.
But what dejure has been setup, has been defacto altered.
This defacto situation, when kept going long enough may then be perceived as something that is dejure.
defacto and dejure are two different animals.
This is the real meaning of : We ave you a republic (dejure), if you can keep it (defacto).
I should add though, that defacto laws have been put on the books operating in such a way that the intended use of 2A has become a catch-22. Hence, the push to frame it in terms of hunting.