Well after they updated the data to take into account Trump’s travel bans, the model predictions dropped to what we ended up seeing, and all of that was memory holed for the sheep.
Sure there are good models and bad models. But the true weakness vulnerable to exploitation is the data.
They dropped the models to match reality after the models were proven wrong. That doesn't mean they actually fixed their algorithm. It just means they twisted a malfunctioning algorithm until it spit out results they could use.
This isn't science. It's statistical modeling backed by dollars. Pay enough, and they'll get any result you could want.
Bullcrap. Show me one website that was reporting the numbers would be under half a million dead from the Rona in 2020 as of March of last year according to the official models.
The numbers dropped because they input real data until it overrode the algorithm.
Also, applying mathematics to statistical models of reality is by definition science. The algorithm is your hypothesis. You're then supposed to test your hypothesis and compare the results to your model, but they seem to be skipping that step.
Now, keep it up and you're going to make me go all Thomas Edison on you and put an end to your gaslighting.
If you say so, fren. If you rely on what’s on websites as your source for evidence of anything, then there’s nothing I can say that will change your mind.
Well after they updated the data to take into account Trump’s travel bans, the model predictions dropped to what we ended up seeing, and all of that was memory holed for the sheep.
Sure there are good models and bad models. But the true weakness vulnerable to exploitation is the data.
They dropped the models to match reality after the models were proven wrong. That doesn't mean they actually fixed their algorithm. It just means they twisted a malfunctioning algorithm until it spit out results they could use.
This isn't science. It's statistical modeling backed by dollars. Pay enough, and they'll get any result you could want.
No, the numbers dropped after they updated it with Trump’s travel ban.
They didn’t change the algorithms, they changed the data.
Who said anything about science?
Bullcrap. Show me one website that was reporting the numbers would be under half a million dead from the Rona in 2020 as of March of last year according to the official models.
The numbers dropped because they input real data until it overrode the algorithm.
Also, applying mathematics to statistical models of reality is by definition science. The algorithm is your hypothesis. You're then supposed to test your hypothesis and compare the results to your model, but they seem to be skipping that step.
Now, keep it up and you're going to make me go all Thomas Edison on you and put an end to your gaslighting.
If you say so, fren. If you rely on what’s on websites as your source for evidence of anything, then there’s nothing I can say that will change your mind.
Thomas Edison away, whatever that means.