Google can find photos that have been searched and are searchable. The more buried a photo is, the harder Google will have finding it.
I know, because I’m running a reverse image search on a concert photo I took of my favorite singer over a decade ago. It is stored in an album on a Flickr account that I abandoned. No results.
Something without easy faces… like clouds… would be even more difficult. No easy features to match.
On the other hand, finding an unpublished photo of Trump just requires you being a bit of a news junkie and dedicated to the craft of posting as Q. Just pick a few AF1 photographers and check out their portfolios.
Please, please do not trust Googling shit as a way to verify the truth about anything.
I am not sure you understand the window proof. The original Q account posted a photo of clouds from an airplane. Google Image Search and 4chan autists could not find this photograph on the Internet prior to Q posting it, suggesting it was an original. Months later, when Q posted from his new account, he verified the tripcode change by posting a second photo from that series clearly taken a few seconds later, but from a different position. Subtle variations between the photos proved they were two different photos from the same period. This then raises the question: how could an imposter have a second photo in a series of original photos by Q?
Yes.
Google can find photos that have been searched and are searchable. The more buried a photo is, the harder Google will have finding it.
I know, because I’m running a reverse image search on a concert photo I took of my favorite singer over a decade ago. It is stored in an album on a Flickr account that I abandoned. No results.
Something without easy faces… like clouds… would be even more difficult. No easy features to match.
On the other hand, finding an unpublished photo of Trump just requires you being a bit of a news junkie and dedicated to the craft of posting as Q. Just pick a few AF1 photographers and check out their portfolios.
Please, please do not trust Googling shit as a way to verify the truth about anything.
I am not sure you understand the window proof. The original Q account posted a photo of clouds from an airplane. Google Image Search and 4chan autists could not find this photograph on the Internet prior to Q posting it, suggesting it was an original. Months later, when Q posted from his new account, he verified the tripcode change by posting a second photo from that series clearly taken a few seconds later, but from a different position. Subtle variations between the photos proved they were two different photos from the same period. This then raises the question: how could an imposter have a second photo in a series of original photos by Q?