Ok, that is acceptable, real answers are always best. I'll give a bit of inside info myself. I wasn't real keen on Q at the beginning. I've always been a skeptic, never thought the 9/11 story was real, etc.
Pardon the length here. A friend of mine who I've known for 30+ yrs asked me one day if I had heard of the "book of Q", the original one which contained the early drops, not the newer, lengthier one. My response was no I hadn't, he then goes on to explain a bit about it and it sounded like typical 4chan social engineering to me -- I didn't give another though until the next week when he mentioned it again. I knew he would keep bringing it up b/c he is persistent, but at the same time this man is one of the most logical people I have known, not exactly prone to whims and conspiracy theory, he is the penultimate "show me the data" person. I read the pdf he sent me, and I still wasn't convinced, I read it another 3 times with the last using a different perspective. I threw out the Hillary being arrested as it hadn't happened, perhaps something in the future. The rest of it what was being posted was simply setting the framework -- akin to hearing "this will be important later on in calculus" when taking algebra. Anyways, it was interesting, especially the remarks about NoName. The one thing that really stood out, was the format, the posts asked quetions, not giving defacto statements -- the posts encouraged thinking and research from the start. Then the Saudi purge happened, and I was convinced there was more to this than simply a well informed individual posting possibly sketchy info.
If you have time to read/post here, do this then if you would, watch Ultimate Qproofs, youtube nuked it off the site again, which should say something in and of itself. Or read the Book of Q proofs on the resources lower right side margin. If you can't take the time to see what the "opposition" has to offer, it creates quite difficult circumstances in which to dialogue if one side is always saying "that isn't correct" when they haven't looked at the data. I read lots of lefty blogs and articles, talked to lots of lefties, so I know for myself how they think, I am not taking someone else's opinion from a news site or conservative opinion. I think it's fair for the left to do the same.
I don't like using dates either, it sets up the fence sitters for an emotional fall, plus the world is dynamic with trillions of moving parts.
Ok, that is acceptable, real answers are always best. I'll give a bit of inside info myself. I wasn't real keen on Q at the beginning. I've always been a skeptic, never thought the 9/11 story was real, etc.
Pardon the length here. A friend of mine who I've known for 30+ yrs asked me one day if I had heard of the "book of Q", the original one which contained the early drops, not the newer, lengthier one. My response was no I hadn't, he then goes on to explain a bit about it and it sounded like typical 4chan social engineering to me -- I didn't give another though until the next week when he mentioned it again. I knew he would keep bringing it up b/c he is persistent, but at the same time this man is one of the most logical people I have known, not exactly prone to whims and conspiracy theory, he is the penultimate "show me the data" person. I read the pdf he sent me, and I still wasn't convinced, I read it another 3 times with the last using a different perspective. I threw out the Hillary being arrested as it hadn't happened, perhaps something in the future. The rest of it what was being posted was simply setting the framework -- akin to hearing "this will be important later on in calculus" when taking algebra. Anyways, it was interesting, especially the remarks about NoName. The one thing that really stood out, was the format, the posts asked quetions, not giving defacto statements -- the posts encouraged thinking and research from the start. Then the Saudi purge happened, and I was convinced there was more to this than simply a well informed individual posting possibly sketchy info.
If you have time to read/post here, do this then if you would, watch Ultimate Qproofs, youtube nuked it off the site again, which should say something in and of itself. Or read the Book of Q proofs on the resources lower right side margin. If you can't take the time to see what the "opposition" has to offer, it creates quite difficult circumstances in which to dialogue if one side is always saying "that isn't correct" when they haven't looked at the data. I read lots of lefty blogs and articles, talked to lots of lefties, so I know for myself how they think, I am not taking someone else's opinion from a news site or conservative opinion. I think it's fair for the left to do the same.
I don't like using dates either, it sets up the fence sitters for an emotional fall, plus the world is dynamic with trillions of moving parts.