We're outcasts of social media and msm. You do know about all the conservative and q related accounts that were banned from twitter, facebook, etc... and you do know about all the hit pieces all over msm about QAnon right? Its not hard to tell that we're outcasts, its because we believe trump won. Interesting how you cant see that
I agree. Theres bindness on both sides of the fence though. I do feel we are the majority, whether the individual considers themself a Q follower or just a maga supporter, i believe combined thats the majority. And its only growing. But from the other side we're only seen as outcasts, nothing more. Unfortunately that specific view of us being outcasts is projected by the msm hive mind.
My personal belief is that whether Q is or isnt real is irrelevant. In my opinion Q was a "psyop" of sorts, but not to silence people. It was meant to wake the masses, and that it has, whether it be directly or indirectly. The average joe had no clue and no interest in politics or the corruption. But thats changed drastically.
Whether someone believes anything Q has to say at this point is a wasted argument. If there's enough people who believe Q to make msm headlines and to get the kind of hit pieces that it has, then the "psyop" was an astounding success. New believers or followers are welcome, thatll come naturally as the believers talk about it.
But theres much bigger comversations to be had than whether q is or isnt real, but some people will still focus on that talking point. Cant do much about that
I claim that the sun is an alien, but to prove it, you need to commit to reading my 1,500 pages of alt-sourced info and watch my videos and decode my puzzles. Nothing on its own would prove me right, but if you read and watch all of it, it’ll make sense.
You tell me no and justifiably ignore me. Why would you commit time and resources to a theory of a random crazy person?
I claim to be an astronomer. You laugh and say you don’t believe me.
I PROVE I am an astronomer who specializes in solar physics.
Now you’ll read what I have to say. You’ll still think I’m crazy, but if anyone can be credible on a theory like that, it’s me. So some people will at least be convinced to read everything.
That’s what Q is. Anonymous, nobody has any reason to do what you guys have done. Nobody has any reason to research your sources. Nobody has any reason to put a single second into Q.
But if he is who he claims to be? And proves it? Well, that changes everything.
I know it’s inconvenient for you guys, but that’s the truth. Unmasking Q legitimizes him, or delegitimizes him. Probably makes or breaks this entire movement. Without his identity, I have extreme doubts that you’ll ever see a Great Awakening.
we may not see a great awakening in the sense that you may be thinking. theres already alot of people who believe it, and only more to come with the tyrannical b.s. that is happening on a daily basis.
I dont think for one second that the typical Q believer started believing Q because they were just innocently interested, i think most of the time there's a lead up.
alot of people started looking at Q because of trump, probably most. they were trump supporters who either thought msm was doing him dirty with all the bad press, or they thought he was correct about the covid b.s., or maybe they thought the election was rigged
other people maybe found Q through other means. people like alex jones maybe influenced people in the right way to lead them to Q, but i HIGHLY doubt that a decent percent of people found Q just because they thought Q's drops were interesting.
i agree that most people that come across Q drops randomly would probably give them the same attention as flat earth, 9/11 faked theory, moon landing faked theory, etc... which is slim to none
No, we don’t believe that. Q’s posts have inherent value as assembled text. All you have to do is read the posts and consider them with an open mind and the narrative Q paints provides the reader with a new way of looking at the world, drawing connections between news stories and other data points (historical events) that has value in and of itself to provide direction for additional research and further questions to be asked. Q is a guide of sorts in this way, and who he is specifically is not super important to us (notice it is the Q skeptics and Q haters who bring this up more than we do).
Further, Q has already told us who he is: a military team of less than 10 people. Beyond that, we are encouraged by the proofs connecting Q to Trump because they add legitimacy, but Q’s posts as simply text on a screen were already fascinating before those confirmations. I mean, even if Q was a straight up LARP, his posts still have value because nobody has really achieved a LARP like this. The biggest would have been John Titor, and Q is already far more elaborate than Titor, and people still read and enjoy Titor. You don’t have to get super attached to this stuff. Think of it as a thought experiment. “If I consider this lens, do world events now make MORE sense or LESS sense?” Repeatedly for those who have been following since 2017, the lens Q provided has consistently made world events make more sense, not less. That has been its own form of confirmation as well.
Would Trump coming forward and saying, “Q is real” help people to believe? Probably, but I think the Q haters would be able to ignore even that. At any rate, one of the important things to understand about Q is that plausible deniability has been embedded throughout this entire operation. I think that was done for two, possibly three reasons. One, to avoid breaking certain classification rules. Two, to undermine the media’s ability to report on Q without sounding crazy. And three, to allow skeptics a choice to disbelieve truths that they aren’t ready to handle (e.g., like the possibility that Hitler wasn’t killed in the bunker). So when someone points to plausible deniability, that doesn’t debunk anything to us, we just see that as an option the military has given you to maintain your psychological stability.
The other thing is we don’t really care what you think about Q. YOU are the ones trying to convince US. YOU are the ones invested in our thoughts and what we think. You are the ones making documentaries about US. If you don’t believe in Q, fine. We aren’t going to go and make a documentary about you. If you don’t want to read the posts, fine. If you want to go complain to your buddies about us, go for it. We don’t really think about what you guys think. Think whatever you want. Meanwhile we will continue to research and talk.
We're outcasts of social media and msm. You do know about all the conservative and q related accounts that were banned from twitter, facebook, etc... and you do know about all the hit pieces all over msm about QAnon right? Its not hard to tell that we're outcasts, its because we believe trump won. Interesting how you cant see that
I see it. It’s just not always super clear whether a Q person sees themselves as an underdog or as having already won. Not everyone is the same.
I agree. Theres bindness on both sides of the fence though. I do feel we are the majority, whether the individual considers themself a Q follower or just a maga supporter, i believe combined thats the majority. And its only growing. But from the other side we're only seen as outcasts, nothing more. Unfortunately that specific view of us being outcasts is projected by the msm hive mind.
My personal belief is that whether Q is or isnt real is irrelevant. In my opinion Q was a "psyop" of sorts, but not to silence people. It was meant to wake the masses, and that it has, whether it be directly or indirectly. The average joe had no clue and no interest in politics or the corruption. But thats changed drastically.
Whether someone believes anything Q has to say at this point is a wasted argument. If there's enough people who believe Q to make msm headlines and to get the kind of hit pieces that it has, then the "psyop" was an astounding success. New believers or followers are welcome, thatll come naturally as the believers talk about it.
But theres much bigger comversations to be had than whether q is or isnt real, but some people will still focus on that talking point. Cant do much about that
Here’s a quick explanation.
I claim that the sun is an alien, but to prove it, you need to commit to reading my 1,500 pages of alt-sourced info and watch my videos and decode my puzzles. Nothing on its own would prove me right, but if you read and watch all of it, it’ll make sense.
You tell me no and justifiably ignore me. Why would you commit time and resources to a theory of a random crazy person?
I claim to be an astronomer. You laugh and say you don’t believe me.
I PROVE I am an astronomer who specializes in solar physics.
Now you’ll read what I have to say. You’ll still think I’m crazy, but if anyone can be credible on a theory like that, it’s me. So some people will at least be convinced to read everything.
That’s what Q is. Anonymous, nobody has any reason to do what you guys have done. Nobody has any reason to research your sources. Nobody has any reason to put a single second into Q.
But if he is who he claims to be? And proves it? Well, that changes everything.
I know it’s inconvenient for you guys, but that’s the truth. Unmasking Q legitimizes him, or delegitimizes him. Probably makes or breaks this entire movement. Without his identity, I have extreme doubts that you’ll ever see a Great Awakening.
we may not see a great awakening in the sense that you may be thinking. theres already alot of people who believe it, and only more to come with the tyrannical b.s. that is happening on a daily basis.
I dont think for one second that the typical Q believer started believing Q because they were just innocently interested, i think most of the time there's a lead up.
alot of people started looking at Q because of trump, probably most. they were trump supporters who either thought msm was doing him dirty with all the bad press, or they thought he was correct about the covid b.s., or maybe they thought the election was rigged
other people maybe found Q through other means. people like alex jones maybe influenced people in the right way to lead them to Q, but i HIGHLY doubt that a decent percent of people found Q just because they thought Q's drops were interesting.
i agree that most people that come across Q drops randomly would probably give them the same attention as flat earth, 9/11 faked theory, moon landing faked theory, etc... which is slim to none
No, we don’t believe that. Q’s posts have inherent value as assembled text. All you have to do is read the posts and consider them with an open mind and the narrative Q paints provides the reader with a new way of looking at the world, drawing connections between news stories and other data points (historical events) that has value in and of itself to provide direction for additional research and further questions to be asked. Q is a guide of sorts in this way, and who he is specifically is not super important to us (notice it is the Q skeptics and Q haters who bring this up more than we do).
Further, Q has already told us who he is: a military team of less than 10 people. Beyond that, we are encouraged by the proofs connecting Q to Trump because they add legitimacy, but Q’s posts as simply text on a screen were already fascinating before those confirmations. I mean, even if Q was a straight up LARP, his posts still have value because nobody has really achieved a LARP like this. The biggest would have been John Titor, and Q is already far more elaborate than Titor, and people still read and enjoy Titor. You don’t have to get super attached to this stuff. Think of it as a thought experiment. “If I consider this lens, do world events now make MORE sense or LESS sense?” Repeatedly for those who have been following since 2017, the lens Q provided has consistently made world events make more sense, not less. That has been its own form of confirmation as well.
Would Trump coming forward and saying, “Q is real” help people to believe? Probably, but I think the Q haters would be able to ignore even that. At any rate, one of the important things to understand about Q is that plausible deniability has been embedded throughout this entire operation. I think that was done for two, possibly three reasons. One, to avoid breaking certain classification rules. Two, to undermine the media’s ability to report on Q without sounding crazy. And three, to allow skeptics a choice to disbelieve truths that they aren’t ready to handle (e.g., like the possibility that Hitler wasn’t killed in the bunker). So when someone points to plausible deniability, that doesn’t debunk anything to us, we just see that as an option the military has given you to maintain your psychological stability.
The other thing is we don’t really care what you think about Q. YOU are the ones trying to convince US. YOU are the ones invested in our thoughts and what we think. You are the ones making documentaries about US. If you don’t believe in Q, fine. We aren’t going to go and make a documentary about you. If you don’t want to read the posts, fine. If you want to go complain to your buddies about us, go for it. We don’t really think about what you guys think. Think whatever you want. Meanwhile we will continue to research and talk.