I dont think the deaths really matter surprised Pfizer is ok with them approving something and allowing liability to potentially fall on them when they've been making money hand over first over the last several months without any consequence.
I can't see how the FDA can approve it. They probably will because there is no integrity left among the powers they be. Though, my theory is this is a ploy to get those saying it is not approved to go ahead and get it because they are gong to approve it. See, it is safe or why else would they be approving it.
well, it's the NYT so it could all be BS, but who knows. Maybe their pockets are the deepest, maybe they have the best crony connections, maybe they are "further along" the "process."
But the real takeaway is that the "but but it's experimental" defense won't last. If they're dead set on jabbing everyone at all costs regardless of consent then they WILL get these things "approved" by the FDA no matter how many deaths and side effects there are.
I hope not, we should all hope and pray they don't approve these.
but a sufficiently corrupt FDA can approve whatever they want to approve.
exactly, how can they approve something with thousands of deaths? They axed the swine flu vax after ~50 deaths.
I dont think the deaths really matter surprised Pfizer is ok with them approving something and allowing liability to potentially fall on them when they've been making money hand over first over the last several months without any consequence.
there won't be any liability for these jabs, is someone going to undo their no-liability clause they have presently?
I can't see how the FDA can approve it. They probably will because there is no integrity left among the powers they be. Though, my theory is this is a ploy to get those saying it is not approved to go ahead and get it because they are gong to approve it. See, it is safe or why else would they be approving it.
Shot for shot. Bet my shot for them will reach the target faster
Why Pfizer and not Moderna? Just wondering.
well, it's the NYT so it could all be BS, but who knows. Maybe their pockets are the deepest, maybe they have the best crony connections, maybe they are "further along" the "process."
48 hour rule
yeah, it's Yahoo parroting the NYT.
But the real takeaway is that the "but but it's experimental" defense won't last. If they're dead set on jabbing everyone at all costs regardless of consent then they WILL get these things "approved" by the FDA no matter how many deaths and side effects there are.
I hope not, we should all hope and pray they don't approve these.
but a sufficiently corrupt FDA can approve whatever they want to approve.