well, it's the NYT so it could all be BS, but who knows. Maybe their pockets are the deepest, maybe they have the best crony connections, maybe they are "further along" the "process."
But the real takeaway is that the "but but it's experimental" defense won't last. If they're dead set on jabbing everyone at all costs regardless of consent then they WILL get these things "approved" by the FDA no matter how many deaths and side effects there are.
I hope not, we should all hope and pray they don't approve these.
but a sufficiently corrupt FDA can approve whatever they want to approve.
Why Pfizer and not Moderna? Just wondering.
well, it's the NYT so it could all be BS, but who knows. Maybe their pockets are the deepest, maybe they have the best crony connections, maybe they are "further along" the "process."
48 hour rule
yeah, it's Yahoo parroting the NYT.
But the real takeaway is that the "but but it's experimental" defense won't last. If they're dead set on jabbing everyone at all costs regardless of consent then they WILL get these things "approved" by the FDA no matter how many deaths and side effects there are.
I hope not, we should all hope and pray they don't approve these.
but a sufficiently corrupt FDA can approve whatever they want to approve.