Yeah but this is how language works. When I say "I'd hate to have to bring the lawyers into this," that is clearly me threatening a lawsuit, 100%. Same deal here. "We don't want to have to start separating families" to me clearly implies the clause "but we will if we have to."
Bro I understand exactly what everyone is saying but in this particular case I did not at all get the vibe that he was threatening. It’s a stretch in my opinion and I’m sticking with it. You can disagree with an opinion without being a shill. And calling me one for expressing my honest opinion shows you have insecurity issues
It would be a shame if someone burned your house down if you don't pay them money. They definitely DON'T want to burn your house down. Understand, they DON'T want to do that. So you better pay them.
It sure would be a shame if your business was robbed or burned down, but we can watch it for you.... you know. For a price.
It's a subtle threat, otherwise why say it at all.
Yeah but this is how language works. When I say "I'd hate to have to bring the lawyers into this," that is clearly me threatening a lawsuit, 100%. Same deal here. "We don't want to have to start separating families" to me clearly implies the clause "but we will if we have to."
Not a stretch at all! Clearly implied!
Was not clearly implied at all dude
Bro I understand exactly what everyone is saying but in this particular case I did not at all get the vibe that he was threatening. It’s a stretch in my opinion and I’m sticking with it. You can disagree with an opinion without being a shill. And calling me one for expressing my honest opinion shows you have insecurity issues
It would be a shame if someone burned your house down if you don't pay them money. They definitely DON'T want to burn your house down. Understand, they DON'T want to do that. So you better pay them.