More from Massie.
https://x.com/repthomasmassie/status/1782887904575991936
“There’s nothing that gives them the authority to demand I remove a video from my congressional account, but they are.
There is a fine in the rules for taking pictures/videos on the House floor, but they don’t know if I taped this, and democrats post from the floor frequently (example attached).
I believe to be fined, they have to serve you notice on the floor while it’s happening (that’s how I was fined for not wearing a mask).
Seems a bit creepy that the Sergeant at Arms would be on my X account three days later looking for an infraction. And how would deleting the video undo my alleged infraction of filming on the House floor? (It wouldn’t)
The uniparty is big mad at me for exposing them on several votes and for asking the Speaker to resign. The Speaker, his staff, or one of his allies in our conference is probably directing the Sergeant at Arms to do this.”
I'm old enough to remember the mainstream media demonized Ukraine before the 'war' started.
He's charged for misclassifying the repayments to Cohen, in 2017, after the election lol.
DawsonSField has a good thread about this setting a precedent for going after all of the media that conspired to help Hillary and damage Trump in 2016. If The National Enquirer was powerful enough to sway the election as the prosecution argues, what about the rest of the media who actually coordinated with Clinton?
That's the way I see it also. A lot of Biden voters are ashamed of voting for him but can't vote for the bad orange man with mean tweets.
I don't see how somebody can go from voting for Trump to voting for somebody as far left as RFK Jr.
The spyware stuff is legitimate. Back when Trump wanted to ban TikTok I read an article that said TikTok basically has access to everything on your phone. It's a privacy nightmare.
Now, Biden and the left in power want to ban it because they can't effectively censor it and it is being used to redpill the youth. They don't care about privacy, they care about censorship.
I've never used it myself.
Check out the rest of the thread also.
Here's a live tweet thread of the whole proceeding today.
That's exactly what will happen and it'll probably become an election issue.
There will be another call for more war funding or reconstruction, depending on how things go, while Trump and House republicans will be blamed for not going along.
The will of the intel community.
I've seen the argument that the Senate was going to discharge their bill no matter what the House did, and this allowed the House to pass their version, though I don't know if it was actually any different.
In terms of election campaign politics this means the media/democrats can't argue the inevitable collapse of Ukraine's government is the fault of Trump and House republicans, but they'll try anyway.
Are they ever going to say what crime Trump supposedly committed in order to upcharge this to a felony?
Listened to it yesterday off and on throughout the day. First time listening to a full episode of Joe Rogan. I like how they have plenty of time to actually have a conversation and Rogan challenges but isn't combative or argumentative.
He says 'our border' the same way they say 'our democracy', meaning the uniparty elite that run things.
Global Elite News from 2013?
That was also Tucker's point in talking about this, beyond the clip in the post. He talks about how he knew these things before, but the media's framing and narrative didn't allow him to even consider the obvious conclusion he comes to now.
I listened to the whole interview yesterday, first time I've listened to entire episode of Joe Rogan.
Lol, look at Mr. GOPe spreading the narrative Putin will invade Europe if we don't send more money to Ukraine.
Why, did they think they did something illegal?/
Seems like this is another one of those things that the people are being shown for themselves.
So does this now create the precedent that articles of impeachment can just be dismissed if the Senate is controlled by the same party as the person being impeached?
Lol at Murkowski voting present.
If this trial is going to keep him tethered to NYC, he should make use of the time and visit different areas doing mini campaign events.
Some have pointed out that the judge refusing to make accommodations for Passover and keeping a strict Friday schedule precludes Orthodox Jews, who are extremely conservative and pro-Trump.
Stifle or facilitate?
It seems that Mayorkas has gone from refusing to protect the border to actively protecting illegals.
How long until another House republican 'retires' to offset this?