11
dbsupernova 11 points ago +11 / -0

Lol, 'online safety experts.'

They always site these anonymous 'experts'.

2
dbsupernova 2 points ago +2 / -0

Twitter was a massive tool for the left and media to create and drive narratives. Losing that ability is a big deal.

3
dbsupernova 3 points ago +3 / -0

Right now, no. I think they’re using the threat of it to protect Hunter Biden from indictment.

1
dbsupernova 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wonder if it’s only showing the number of new followers? If his account was merely reinstated, those who were following before shouldn’t need to re-follow. I’m sure it’ll sort itself out eventually.

3
dbsupernova 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are they still pretending he was a 'journalist'?

7
dbsupernova 7 points ago +7 / -0

Even if she thinks that, why say it now and not save it for primary season? Guess the establishment is trying to build a narrative.

7
dbsupernova 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's a good point. The Supreme Court often rejects things for technical or procedural reasons, but people assume they are refusing to hear the issue.

2
dbsupernova 2 points ago +4 / -2

It’s just going to be kabuki theater, but it’ll give the media something to reeee about and make the democrats/media play defense. It’ll be a stark contrast to the dems ‘investigations’ of Trump that found nothing. Just look at what’s already publicly known about Biden’s business dealings.

Remember, David Weiss, the US Attorney from Delaware, has been investigating Hunter Biden since 2020 for tax fraud. US Attorney Scott Brady out of Pittsburgh was also investigating Hunter Biden, but he resigned in Feb 2021 before being fired.

13
dbsupernova 13 points ago +13 / -0

Good point about looking like the reasonable alternative to the chaos, it’s why he had a calm serious tone. That’s actually what Biden ran on, but now we have actual chaos, not a media narrative. I don’t think an announcement speech would have been the right place to bring up Q or other ‘conspiracy theories.’ He’d just be neutering his own speech. Of course we’d all love it, but the media would spin it to normies as Trump off the rails.

I think any talk from Trump about Q or happenings will happen after action has been taken. He won’t be seen as driving it.

4
dbsupernova 4 points ago +4 / -0

I didn’t think he was somber, I thought he was very serious. I agree about ops unfolding behind the scenes. Trump did the same thing while in office, distracting everyone while important events secretly unfold.

9
dbsupernova 9 points ago +11 / -2

Either there’s a plan or there’s not. I choose to believe there is based on everything we all know by reading this place. Things will happen when those behind the plan want them to. Trump announcing doesn’t change that. I understand why people are disappointed, I am too to an extent, but this is where patience is needed.

2
dbsupernova 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wasn’t too long ago California tried banning republicans from ballot harvesting.

view more: Next ›