People don't purchase "investment" vehicles to sell at the entry price.

We're looking forward.

To speed this up:

• things are, in general, worth what other's will pay for it
• the floor of an asset or item is generally it's intrinsic value (for large enterprises, there are multiple ways to attempt to quantify that, enterprise value, breakup value, liquidation value, etc... for currencies, what else can it be use for?)
• people can be convinced to pay (bubble mentality, PR/pump, grow expectations, etc.) in excess of something's intrinsic value, but when that intrinsic value doesn't ultimately increase, the price will ultimately converge to liquidation value
• an intermediary currency can, and will, retain value when backed directly by assets, but (aside from some gimmicky attempts at asset-backed "cryptos") cryptocurrencies have no asset backing, no instrinsic value, and no floor. And with early investors becoming "cryptobillionaires" and "cryptomillionaires", essentially pulling huge sums of money out of these systems, when this larger asset-bubble market pops and people want hard assets or need cash, "crypto" investors will learn all at once that the emperor has no clothes, and their precious tokens have no value.

Look, I don't presume I'll convince you at this point. And you unjustifiably keep trying to declare victory on this, so that's weird. So I'll just let this drop here.

But I'd truly hate to have this great board, here serving a far larger purpose, be the cause of someone looking for money-for-nothing (aren't we all) to be suckered into investing in "cryptocurrencies" without knowing full well what they're getting into. If the "features" you've described seduced them, or something else 🤑 has, fine... but I think it'd be tragic if they sank their hard earned money into an intrinsically worthless scam without, at least, informed consent.