I heard that someone is doing well in a court case in Alberta because he is demanding that they prove that they even have a case, that they can show how COVID, specifically, requires that people follow these "mandates" in order for the public to be safe. They can't.
This has also happened in Ireland and damn if I can't find the report. Used same tactics and asking for proof of its existence. They can't isolate the virus from any other. Also the 1500 swabs that were positive that they couldn't find anything but flu under a microscope. The severe cases may have had more than one strain. A cold also tests positive.
I saw that as well and it sounded promising. I wonder what some of the lawyers in the US are using in their court cases. They need to look at his argument.
I heard that someone is doing well in a court case in Alberta because he is demanding that they prove that they even have a case, that they can show how COVID, specifically, requires that people follow these "mandates" in order for the public to be safe. They can't.
Yes! I haven't watched yet, but I believe this is the interview on Stew Peters' show https://www.bitchute.com/video/I599hTkdBd3g/
He won, and Alberta has ended all covid restrictions and relabeled the illnesses the flu, cold or other normal illness.
This has also happened in Ireland and damn if I can't find the report. Used same tactics and asking for proof of its existence. They can't isolate the virus from any other. Also the 1500 swabs that were positive that they couldn't find anything but flu under a microscope. The severe cases may have had more than one strain. A cold also tests positive.
I saw that as well and it sounded promising. I wonder what some of the lawyers in the US are using in their court cases. They need to look at his argument.