That would be completely unconstitutional to do so.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
To petition is to request election data. To publish it cannot be prohibited. If you want to trust “science” as they say, trust the scientific method. If they won fair and square, it will hold up to scrutiny and would be undeniable. We are at the second to last step, analysis. Conclusion comes next and they seem very nervous.
That would be completely unconstitutional to do so.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
To petition is to request election data. To publish it cannot be prohibited. If you want to trust “science” as they say, trust the scientific method. If they won fair and square, it will hold up to scrutiny and would be undeniable. We are at the second to last step, analysis. Conclusion comes next and they seem very nervous.
The satanic fox is guarding the hen-house.
Ain't that the truth.