If they are already restricting commerce to vaxxed only (NYC, certain countries, companies, restaurants) and mandating at jobs, does that not make an argument stronger for Mark of the Beast for religious exemption? ( I know they will like laugh it off and fire us anyways).
If anything even has a whiff of Mark of the Beast I will reject as a possibility of getting it. this reeks.
Vax Passports etc appear to be the Mark or a precursor to the Mark.
I scoffed at people that said the jab was the mark, and it probably isn't, but it seems to get closer to what I understand the mark to be everyday.
I may try this.
thanks! I have seen your list and it keeps growing and growing!
I'll likely have to start the process before long of getting religious exemption or something or get fired and then sue but whatever.
Nice :) You got a good dad.
You're female??? Oh I'm even happier for you now!! :) I am too. Most people mistake me for a guy on this board, it's pretty funny.
That's awesome!! I was a total tomboy growing up - despite not having a dad around and having a mom who immigrated here from Europe (thus no gun instruction - she had one, but was afraid to let anyone know because that mindset stayed with her from living in communism), I was climbing trees and riding on pretty much anything with wheels. My friends and I played baseball, soccer, tennis together, we were such active kids. And we had video games (Atari), they were fun but we would always rather be outside building forts in the forest or tying a rope to someone's bike and street skiing behind it on a skateboard. Video games were for rainy days. I'd say we got the best of both worlds. We got to play hard and have real fun, then get all gussied up with makeup and hair spray. I did boyish things as a kid, but I never for a minute wondered whether or not I was a girl.
Gotcha - will do. Best of luck to you with your loved one - I'll pray for you!
Within this video is the pathetic response to religious exceptions brought on by the rotten hierarchy within the Catholic Church I am very sad to report https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxxUP8pz4ts&list=WL&index=5
It seems to me those who have had COVID should qualify for a medical exemption. They have natural immunity & we know the vaxx is of no benefit to them. In my opinion, this would be a better route to go if you've had COVID. Or even if you haven't had COVID, your doc may provide you 1.
As far as a religious exemption, it applies to those who have a "sincerely held" belief. Both Title VI (public) & Title VII (employment) make it clear that neither a business nor an employer may not challenge you as to whether the vaxx would violate your "sincerely held" belief.
However, be forewarned that under Title VII, an employer does NOT have to provide a religious exemption or accommodation should it cause an "undue hardship" for the employer. For years the EEOC has given the example of an ER who sees a significant increase in patients on Christmas Eve & Christmas requires all employees to work. Should someone who is Christian who requests those days off to observe their religious holiday, the employer can legally deny the request. The reason being if the employer Grant's the religious accommodation to 1 Christian, they would have to provide it to all Christian employees which would cause a shortage is staff (aka i.e. an undue hardship). I can foresee the EEOC using this as a reason to deny a religious accommodation & force employees to get vaxxed.
well, it is my sincerely held believe all this stuff is the Mark or leading to the Mark.
i'm not sure how it would make for undue hardship as I have an office job, and we've been teleworking for most of this time. when we get back in office more not sure if that will change.
My point being it doesn't matter if you object to the vaxx because you believe it to be the mark of the beast or because it's made from aborted fetal tissue or because it (at least temporarily) changes your DNA or all the above. So long as you believe it violates your sincerely held beliefs. Like I said, your employer is prohibited by from challenging you on it.
I brought up the "undue hardship" exemption to serve as a warning. I do not know our employer and it's not out side the realm of possibility for a company to have an HR dept that's a militant pro vax. This will be their legal arguement so we must be prepared.
But if you give in to fear tactics from people who have an allegiance to Satan and you willingly go along with everything they tell you to do because your fear is greater than your faith in God, doesn't that sort of make you allegiant to satan?
The Mark of the Beast is absolutely either Vaccine passports or, more likely, the vax itself. That’s why you need two shots—to confirm your allegiance to Satan. I’ll also point out that the vax contains the ingredient Luciferase. There is no way it’s not related to the Mark.
how do you know that?
It would seem to me that the mark is meant to corrupt the DNA. these vaccines will do that. and the boosters. also the mark is not only the Mark, it is done in 3 ways. those under the Beast's authority OR his number OR having the Mark. Likely the actually physical mark will come last not first under a process of the "Markening." Are you certain these vax passports and restrictions if you don't have it not the start of this process?