Incidentally, the only person deriving a sexual meaning from the word is you, and you alone. It's certainly not the original definition of the word. If you are deriving a sexual connotation from being called a faggot, that's a reflection on how YOU think.
The term is (get ready for a big word) inherently sexual. This means it refers to sexual activity/identity. You may use a dictionary to review these terms.
Just as the Lord forgave those who crucified them "for they know not what they do", I forgive you for making yourself look foolish and wasting my time.
But the "TED Talk" line is very funny! I have seen that many times on the internet and it is a good, funny thing to say! You did a good job!
The term is (get ready for a big word) inherently sexual. This means it refers to sexual activity/identity. You may use a dictionary to review these terms.
Is this statement a joke? Inherently? Words have no inherent meaning, only derived meaning. Literally everything you said in that statement is so wrong it's actually laughable.
I guess I shouldn't expect much arguing on the internet with common core educated shills, but yikes. You must've been one of those "C's = degrees" rejects skating by on just the bare minimum effort required.
That is a very big concept, Bobby! Words are a piece of our consensual hallucination, manufactured symbols that only have meaning in so far as we agree to the meaning, I bet that really blows your mind, dewd!
What is deliciously ironic is that you suggest words have no inherent meaning, but you agree with my meaning of inherent, suggesting that you DO understand that the dictionary will suffice in defining words.
Thank you for proving my point for me. I had already schooled you, but it's more funny when you do it for me, too.
That is a very big concept, Bobby! Words are a piece of our consensual hallucination, manufactured symbols that only have meaning in so far as we agree to the meaning, I bet that really blows your mind, dewd!
That's literally what I just told you, congrats, you have better reading comprehension than most. But don't go thinking you're blowing someone else's mind for repeating something they literally just told you. FFS you absolute mong.
What is deliciously ironic is that you suggest words have no inherent meaning, but you agree with my meaning of inherent, suggesting that you DO understand that the dictionary will suffice in defining words.
I read words based on context clues. I'm not agreeing with your meaning of any words, you actual moron. I'd also like to point out that words have multiple meanings and are constantly evolving depending on how, when, and why they are used. The more modern uses of words like "gay" and "faggot" are often nonsexual and are simply used to refer to things that are lame.
Suggesting, though, that words have an inherent meaning is like I said, retarded. All interpreted meaning is derived solely by the reader and it is literally impossible for inherent meaning to exist in any form of cryptograph.
Thank you for proving my point for me. I had already schooled you, but it's more funny when you do it for me, too.
You tried to say words have inherent meaning, and now you're trying to cover your ass. Go read a language you have no understanding of, and tell me more about the inherent nature of those words.
Incidentally, the only person deriving a sexual meaning from the word is you, and you alone. It's certainly not the original definition of the word. If you are deriving a sexual connotation from being called a faggot, that's a reflection on how YOU think.
Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.
The term is (get ready for a big word) inherently sexual. This means it refers to sexual activity/identity. You may use a dictionary to review these terms.
Just as the Lord forgave those who crucified them "for they know not what they do", I forgive you for making yourself look foolish and wasting my time.
But the "TED Talk" line is very funny! I have seen that many times on the internet and it is a good, funny thing to say! You did a good job!
Is this statement a joke? Inherently? Words have no inherent meaning, only derived meaning. Literally everything you said in that statement is so wrong it's actually laughable.
I guess I shouldn't expect much arguing on the internet with common core educated shills, but yikes. You must've been one of those "C's = degrees" rejects skating by on just the bare minimum effort required.
That is a very big concept, Bobby! Words are a piece of our consensual hallucination, manufactured symbols that only have meaning in so far as we agree to the meaning, I bet that really blows your mind, dewd!
What is deliciously ironic is that you suggest words have no inherent meaning, but you agree with my meaning of inherent, suggesting that you DO understand that the dictionary will suffice in defining words.
Thank you for proving my point for me. I had already schooled you, but it's more funny when you do it for me, too.
That's literally what I just told you, congrats, you have better reading comprehension than most. But don't go thinking you're blowing someone else's mind for repeating something they literally just told you. FFS you absolute mong.
I read words based on context clues. I'm not agreeing with your meaning of any words, you actual moron. I'd also like to point out that words have multiple meanings and are constantly evolving depending on how, when, and why they are used. The more modern uses of words like "gay" and "faggot" are often nonsexual and are simply used to refer to things that are lame.
Suggesting, though, that words have an inherent meaning is like I said, retarded. All interpreted meaning is derived solely by the reader and it is literally impossible for inherent meaning to exist in any form of cryptograph.
You tried to say words have inherent meaning, and now you're trying to cover your ass. Go read a language you have no understanding of, and tell me more about the inherent nature of those words.