I think it's less that AOC is necessarily guilty of whatever this guy is accused of, but rather that if we assume everybody has dirt on them, then whose dirt gets released when and where matters.
So I read OP's listing of AOC as a question:
What message might white hats be trying to send about AOC/Kamala/etc. by releasing the dirt on this particular state senator from AZ who had some ties to them, when they could have just as easily released other state representatives dirt?
And I will say that a lot of celebrity politicians go around the country appearing for candidates as a political capital investment, so it's absolutely the case the photos could be meaningless.
I couldn't tell ya w/respect to any of the three, other than it seems the cabal still has some level of control and autonomy and is still fighting back.
There's a theory that nearly all politicians have something on them--some proclivity--that is required for them to advance.
If that is true (hard to verify), then white hats could in theory pick who they arrest and send messages.
This arrest just seems like too much of a coincidence to not have more meaning.
For the record, I'm not the one downvoting you.
I think it's less that AOC is necessarily guilty of whatever this guy is accused of, but rather that if we assume everybody has dirt on them, then whose dirt gets released when and where matters.
So I read OP's listing of AOC as a question:
What message might white hats be trying to send about AOC/Kamala/etc. by releasing the dirt on this particular state senator from AZ who had some ties to them, when they could have just as easily released other state representatives dirt?
And I will say that a lot of celebrity politicians go around the country appearing for candidates as a political capital investment, so it's absolutely the case the photos could be meaningless.
I couldn't tell ya w/respect to any of the three, other than it seems the cabal still has some level of control and autonomy and is still fighting back.