AZ, GA, PA, WI, MI, NV are the states that reported massive irregularities in the vote totals and the laws governing elections that were changed to steal the election.
Would the states in question have decertified and performed audits as they are in the process of doing now?
Would the states 'comply' as a requirement under the Constitution?
Would we have been 6-7-8 months ahead of this audit process?
Would new electors for each state have been appointed to certify the true votes?
Would Trump have been reinstated by now as the duly elected president?
According to the Military/Trump Devolution Plan, did Pence realize what Trump had orchestrated and had organized at the time he certified the fraudulent votes, simply to be where we are now and having to go through all the resistance from the corrupt Deep State players? (We know these military plans are all compartmentalized).
Did Pence know the whole plan to trap all the bad actors and that's why he did not send the electoral votes back to the states in question to be decertified?
Can anyone expand on what/why Pence acted as he did on Jan 6th?
The Military plan as we now know is called Devolution. Nothing about it was leaked. This includes Pence (presumably Deep State).
Trump has said some are good people that have been compromised or blackmailed. Perhaps Trump has known about Pence having been compromised and threw down the gauntlet. That he gave Pence the option of doing the right thing. But on the other hand, he may have had a good inclination how Pence would rule on Jan 6th and henceforth would be able to expose all the Deep State players. More so than if Pence had simply sent the electoral votes back for recertification.
What are you talking about? Devolution is just the name some rando dude on the internet gave to his own personal hypothesis.
Actually devolution is a theory put forth in the 1970's by a band that named itself after its theory. DEVO.
That was de-evolution.
Yes, that is correct, of course.
But the thing about the Devolution report is that not much of it is theory. It is mostly just digging into the details of what actually happened. It talks about what Trump actually did, in regard to EOs, and which people were appointed to which positions, and sheds light on some little known laws, etc. To me, I don't feel that the Devolution report tried to push me into believing a theory, it just provided a more in-depth explanation to some of the details that I was already curious about, which is much appreciated.
A lot of us recognized that something certainly was up after the election when Trump started firing and appointing people to top level positions, but couldn't understand why. Devolution gives a lot more insight into that, which I otherwise would never have known.