IMPORTANT INFO FROM GOVERNMENT AGENCY NCBI, which is a branch of NIH, regarding
INFORMED CONSENT PARAMETERS FOR COVID VACCINES FOCUSING ON ADE (antibody dependent enhancement) published Dec. 4, 2020
EXCERPT: "...Medical ethics standards required that, given the extent of evidence in the medical literature reviewed above, the risk of ADE should be clearly and emphatically distinguished in the informed consent from risks observed rarely as well as the more obvious risk of lack of efficacy, which is unrelated to the specific risk of ADE. Based on the published literature, it should have been obvious to any skilled medical practitioner in 2019 that there is a significant risk to vaccine research subjects that they may experience severe disease once vaccinated, while they might only have experienced a mild, self‐limited disease if not vaccinated. The consent should also clearly distinguish the specific risk of worsened COVID‐19 disease from generic statements about risk of death and generic risk of lack of efficacy of the vaccine..."
CONCLUSION "Given the strong evidence that ADE is a non-theoretical and compelling risk for COVID-19 vaccines and the “laundry list” nature of informed consents, disclosure of the specific risk of worsened COVID-19 disease from vaccination calls for a specific, separate, informed consent form and demonstration of patient comprehension in order to meet medical ethics standards. The informed consent process for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials does not appear to meet this standard. While the COVID-19 global health emergency justifies accelerated vaccine trials of candidates with known liabilities, such an acceleration is not inconsistent with additional attention paid to heightened informed consent procedures specific to COVID-19 vaccine risks." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7645850/
Of course there was. This had been known for years. Informed consent is a no brainer. I enjoyed reading that study.
This is what will be used at the Nuremberg 2.0 trials that will hang [them] all.
This is key. Willful neglect cancels immunity from liability. Informed consent is specified in the EUA.
It's THEIR plan all along. How else will they kill off so many unsuspecting people? They will die 2-3 years after their jabs and no one will equate it with their jab in the first place.
The real concern is the effect on the un-vaccinated. "Marek's disease"
I am familiar with Marek's but unfamiliar with the association of the unvaccinated.
Marek's is the apex example of ADE. On the one hand, vaccines have been successful in stopping the huge losses of birds. On the other hand, while the vaxed birds now survive, so does the virus...it just doesn't kill them. The mutated (ade) virus does however now kill 100% of the un-vaxed exposed to it, and all vaxed birds are "super spreaders". Today ALL commercially raised birds are vaxed.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15757475/
THANK YOU, Fren!