You have a point with mass control. I fully believe that is happening, but humans need to first be herded and trained into such a perfect mentality state in order for it to be most effective. That happened long before AI, and they have become the masters at doing it. It takes a human to interface with a human in order to break their will to submit into MKUltra level control. But individual thought, and a few mistakes on their part (internet), seems to have pervaded much more than they anticipated, and it is infectious. At most, 40-50% are under this type of predictable control. This following belief won't be the majority here, but I believe it is the Spirit of God that is selecting and allowing us to see through the suggestive mind control.
I appreciate your concern that I should maintain some skepticism with Q, and I'll assure you that if you saw the rest of my discussions with this individual, you would see how I've made it clear that the only thing I am not skeptical about is my Christianity, and that I present Q and any other theories as "seemingly most likely".
The point of the discussion was that there are plenty of explicit Q posts to focus on that serve as strong evidence to their validity.
You have a point with mass control. I fully believe that is happening, but humans need to first be herded and trained into such a perfect mentality state in order for it to be most effective. That happened long before AI, and they have become the masters at doing it. It takes a human to interface with a human in order to break their will to submit into MKUltra level control. But individual thought, and a few mistakes on their part (internet), seems to have pervaded much more than they anticipated, and it is infectious. At most, 40-50% are under this type of predictable control. This following belief won't be the majority here, but I believe it is the Spirit of God that is selecting and allowing us to see through the suggestive mind control.
I appreciate your concern that I should maintain some skepticism with Q, and I'll assure you that if you saw the rest of my discussions with this individual, you would see how I've made it clear that the only thing I am not skeptical about is my Christianity, and that I present Q and any other theories as "seemingly most likely".
The point of the discussion was that there are plenty of explicit Q posts to focus on that serve as strong evidence to their validity.
Yea that’s always been concerning for me too, although I guess it really isn’t that surprising.
It’s ok to have hope in Q, but faith? Definitely not.