Every single time someone points out that they know people who got the vax with no negative reaction someone brings up the placebo argument. It's not about just the one comment I responded to not specifically implying it, it's the continuous mention of it in every post/comment that the topic comes up in. Which, at least in my opinion, contributes to an overall implication that the vax has a 100% injury rate and any good outcome must be the placebo.

Now, I suppose it's possible that every real vax is dangerous and every person without a bad reaction got the placebo but I find it unlikely that every single good outcome is a placebo shot and every bad outcome is the "real" vax. That's simply too convenient to be anything other than a false narrative and is way too black and white for reality. Most things aren't either completely horrible or absolutely perfect and I doubt the clot-shot is any different.