2
DontTreadOnIT 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, think about how the public responded to claims of election fraud in Dec 2020. Public perception has shifted dramatically since then.

It had to be this way.

16
DontTreadOnIT 16 points ago +16 / -0

🎯The "leak" was likely intentional, to cause panic among the cabal.

1
DontTreadOnIT 1 point ago +1 / -0

My brother in Christ that post is a joke and I cannot believe someone who frequents this board would present it as evidence of anything.

Tell me, have you personally verified all those sourceless claims? Start going down the list. Shouldn't take you long to realize the whole thing is BS.

2
DontTreadOnIT [M] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some of the seals only seem to clap at things that go against Trump. Isn't that curious?πŸ§πŸ€”

Mods are taking notes though.πŸ˜‰

3
DontTreadOnIT 3 points ago +3 / -0

The establishment hates him. Not sure the average Dem voter does.

Regardless, it's about incremental shift in public opinion. The big reveals were never going to be processed and accepted overnight. If Trump actually does declas election fraud on Thursday then it will be a huge step. Just as Tulsi's declas on Russiagate and covid were huge steps.

3
DontTreadOnIT 3 points ago +3 / -0

If only you enlightened users would share your secret knowledge so the rest of us could see what we have overlooked.

So - for the fifth or sixth time I'll ask - please tell us what we are missing. Must be a hugely significant datapoint if it has convinced you and others to go against Trump on supporting TPUSA.

As you know, this board is full of truth seekers who don't let their egos get in the way. We are all ears. Drop the condescension and present some facts.

1
DontTreadOnIT 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fudd, you're not hearing me. Your experience shooting deer at roughly the same distance / angle over and over again will never show you what soft point bullets will do when they hit a human body.

Being a deer hunter does not make you an expert ballistician. If you bothered researching the topic at all you would see this.

1
DontTreadOnIT 1 point ago +1 / -0

You don't get to just say that and then not tell us what you think Bubbles is overlooking. Frogs don't play that candy cult BS.

I have paid close attention to the trial. To me the evidence against Robinson is overwhelming. So please tell us, what are we missing?

3
DontTreadOnIT 3 points ago +3 / -0

Post-truth world, as someone once put it. The pervasive uncertainty leads some people to doubt even foundational concepts of reality (flat Earthers for example).

For me it's about accumulating enough datapoints. I don't get attached to any particular narrative, I just track patterns and see which narrative ends up with the most supporting datapoints.

The Charlie Kirk murder and subsequent psyop becomes much more clear if you look at all available datapoints. People who buy the BS Candace is selling have failed to look at the big picture. They ignore relevant facts such as Trump's continued support of Erika & TPUSA, the role TPUSA played in getting him elected, and the obvious truth that the DS wanted to destroy that org.

From where I'm sitting it is plain as day that the DS indirectly had Charlie killed using one of their homebrew MKUltra retards, and had a psyop prepared to destroy TPUSA in the wake of his death. Unfortunately some patriots have fallen for it, though I think most who parrot Candace are bots / shills.

2
DontTreadOnIT 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ok Elmer Fudd, now go talk to someone who has been in combat. They will tell you how ignorant that statement is.

2
DontTreadOnIT 2 points ago +2 / -0

What will "patriots" who think like this say when they realize they were wrong about Charlie's murder and they unwittingly defended his killer(s)? Will they apologize to his family? Will they feel remorse for the harm they did to this movement?

Or will they pretend like they were solid patriots all along and never made grave mistakes in this information war?πŸ€”

3
DontTreadOnIT 3 points ago +3 / -0

It fits with the larger fact pattern, while none of Candace's claims are anywhere near the truth.

People need to understand that bad actors like her are muddying the waters so that the truth about Charlie's murder is never found. Her message is tailored for people who believe there is more to the truth but lack the discernment necessary to actually find that truth.

2
DontTreadOnIT [M] 2 points ago +2 / -0

False - only low effort and uncivil comments have been removed. Apparently some people were triggered by this post and unable to form intelligent thoughts.

If Candace supporters had anything of substance to say in rebuttal to this post, no comments would have been removed.

4
DontTreadOnIT 4 points ago +4 / -0

Dismissing the very detailed facts she has presented

Be great if you or any other Candace defender could provide one of those "facts"

4
DontTreadOnIT 4 points ago +4 / -0

So I guess when the truth comes out about cabal crimes and the whole world attacks them, you will defend them? That about right?

5
DontTreadOnIT 5 points ago +5 / -0

This sort of comment is exactly what I expect from the candy cult.

Point to any evidence that TPUSA has been corrupted. You are aware that Trump continues to support both TPUSA and Erika Kirk? Or do you ignore that because it does not fit your favored narrative?

5
DontTreadOnIT 5 points ago +5 / -0

Please, demonstrate your critical thinking skills by explaining what could possibly be accomplished by leaving the scene as is.

Do you understand how evidence collection works?

3
DontTreadOnIT 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wikipedia level knowledge of ballistics ya got there.

Do even the tiniest amount of research on what actually happens when bullets hit a human body, then tell me if you still believe what you wrote.

3
DontTreadOnIT 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ok, put a few vertebrae in there. Can you see how that would change things?

2
DontTreadOnIT 2 points ago +2 / -0

Care to reply to my other comment? Since we are trying to avoid willful ignorance...

4
DontTreadOnIT 4 points ago +4 / -0

False https://x.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/2075343168254750932

Also the bullet was soft point (no hard metal jacket, just lead). Soft point bullets greatly deform no matter what they hit. These little details are important if truth is what you seek.

view more: Next ›