Recently, I've seen some discussions about how to file a letter to your employer, etc., to refuse the shot on the basis of religious rights. However, one thing I really want to see is a complete list of ingredients in this gene-modifying soup so that I can SHOW it contains Aborted Fetal Tissue which is directly contrary to the principles of my religion.
I've seen this Catholic Priest talking about it, as well as this recent statement from the University of Pittsburgh (however this doesn't mention the Covid vaxx specifically).
If anyone could provide a scholarly study or an official document from Pfizer, J&J, etc., which PROVES that they use Aborted Fetal Tissue in this concoction, that would be awesome for me.
Thanks Pedes!
This is why all the biggest antivax forums and groups were nuked in advance of this crap. They had all the info you are looking for. I believe fetal cell lines are used in the development of all or most all vaccines now days. That's one of many more reason antivaxers have been antivax for so long.
Can you recall the names of any of those forums or groups? Maybe some of them are still floating around in web archives or search engine caches...
Vaccination Re-Education Forum had thousands of files available for everyone before getting nuked. Try this. I don't know if they managed to back up the files to another platform yet but some files are available there. https://vaccinationre-education.godaddysites.com/
Here's some info on the aborted fetal tissue:
From a health perspective, the tissues from another human (not just animals) are still foreign, and therefore toxic to the body. One industry friendly website matter-of-factly boasted, “The cells reproduce themselves, so there is no need to abort additional fetuses to sustain the culture supply. Viruses are collected from the diploid cell cultures and then processed further to produce the vaccine itself”. The Liberty Counsel reported, “You may be surprised to learn that some vaccinations are derived from aborted fetal tissue. Vaccines for chicken pox, hepatitis A, and rubella were produced solely from aborted fetal tissue.”
WI-38, MRC-5, DNA, MRC-5 Cellular Protein, Human Serum Albumin (5 different ingredients)
All of these derive from either human tissue or human blood.
MRC-5, MRC-5 Cellular Protein
To explain MRC-5, let’s look at a brief history before MRC-5 came about. In 1964, during an outbreak of rubella, some doctors urged women who had been exposed to the rubella virus to abort their pregnancy. (Why? Rubella is an extremely mild virus [source: SA Plotkin, “Development of RA 27/3 attenuated rubella virus grown in WI-38 cells,” London 1968 Symp. Series, 11, 249-260, Karger, Basel/New York 1969]. Most people don’t show any symptoms, especially children, some may get a rash all over their body. Rubella becomes dangerous when a pregnant woman is exposed to the virus because it has the potential to cause severe abnormalities in the child.) From one of these aborted children that had been exposed to rubella virus, doctors developed a virus strain that became known as RA/27/3 — Rubella; Abortus; 27th aborted fetus; 3rd tissue explant. In other words, it took 26 aborted infants to get the right strain. The virus was then cultivated on the lung tissue of another aborted child, and this child became known as WI-38 — Winster Institute 38). WI -38 was an infant girl at 3 months gestation. What makes this seem somewhat ridiculous is that the Japanese, years before the first aborted infant was used to extract the rubella virus, proved that the virus can be taken from a living child simply by swabbing their throat.
In the 1970s, a second human cell line was created from an infant boy at 14 weeks gestation and became known as MRC-5.
WI-38 and MRC-5 have become the most used cell lines to make vaccinations. Labs currently use these 2 cell lines, as well as new sources (a.k.a new aborted infants) to create new vaccines.
The use of tissue from aborted infants has caused heated debate because it is ethically questionable. Pro-life groups, which include many churches and parents whose morals condemn profiting from aborted infants, continue to fight the pharmaceutical companies to produce vaccines that do not contain this tissue. And the thing is, it’s possible. Vaccines can be made from other sources.
DNA
DNA is harvested from aborted infants. It is used as adjuvant in vaccines. In vaccines, 100,000,000 bits and strands of human DNA are allowed per dose. Again, we encounter the issue of the ethical dilemma for this issue.
Human Serum Albumin
Human Serum Albumin is a stabilizing protein made from human blood donated by screened donors. We already discussed above why injecting a protein directly into the body is dangerous.
With that aside, let’s look at the points we reach regarding these 5 different ingredients:
We have human DNA, human cell lines from aborted infants, and protein from human blood in 23 of our vaccines. When we need a blood transfusion, or a blood donation of some kind, what is absolutely required? A match, correct? For example, if a person with type O blood receives type A+ blood, the outcome is fatal. There are rules of science that cannot be crossed regarding DNA and blood. It is imperative to be tested when receiving any type of tissue or blood to ensure that a fatal blood or tissue type isn’t put into your body. So may I ask: How many of you or your children were given a blood test before receiving vaccinations? We all know the answer to that. It doesn’t happen. The outcome to mixing and NOT matching human blood and tissue with other humans can be virtually disastrous. Remember that every one of those 4 ingredients have human DNA in them. Even after the protein is extracted from human blood, DNA remains.
There was a recent study done by Dr. Helen Ratajczak called “Theoretical aspects of autism: Causes–A review.” In this study, Dr. Ratajczak studied the problems associated with injecting human tissue into another person. Please see the CBS report on this study. In this CBS report it says:
Ratajczak also looks at a factor that hasn’t been widely discussed: human DNA contained in vaccines. That’s right, human DNA. Ratajczak reports that about the same time vaccine makers took most thimerosal out of most vaccines (with the exception of flu shots which still widely contain thimerosal), they began making some vaccines using human tissue. Ratajczak says human tissue is currently used in 23 vaccines. She discusses the increase in autism incidences corresponding with the introduction of human DNA to MMR vaccine, and suggests the two could be linked. Ratajczak also says an additional increased spike in autism occurred in 1995 when chicken pox vaccine was grown in human fetal tissue.
Why could human DNA potentially cause brain damage? The way Ratajczak explained it to me: “Because it’s human DNA and recipients are humans, there’s homologous recombinaltion tiniker. That DNA is incorporated into the host DNA. Now it’s changed, altered self and body kills it. Where is this most expressed? The neurons of the brain. Now you have body killing the brain cells and it’s an ongoing inflammation. It doesn’t stop, it continues through the life of that individual.”
If you decide to learn about all the other vaccines they have been giving to our children in recent years, I promise you will understand why the antivax community has been trying to fight for so long. But the media as always, twists and lies about everything to make antivaxers look like morons.
Thanks for the info. I'll take a close look at all this. I agree, the antivaxxers have been right and everyone else is tardy to the party.