I understand what they are supposed to be, but how did Mike get his hands on them? And how does he know what he has are legit?
To go along with that, does he have anyway of proving these are legit captures? or is that what this is supposed to prove?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (86)
sorted by:
Packet captures, typically, are captured outside the system - on the network. It can be anywhere between the two end points. I believe the white hats had the system under surveillence and packet captures were one aspect of it.
It is possible to becapturing on the device itself too. but it would typically require modifying the configuration and installed software - would by itself invalidates the machines. So I think there was some military level surveillence on the networks.
He knows its legit because he probably got it from the Q team.
If they were not legit captures, it would be very easy to prove they were fake, but correlating something in the packets - the origin, destination, time sequence etc.
Remember, not only do the captures show any foreign interference, it wouldn also be showing the sequence of events as it happened. So that can be correlated as well.
Packet captures can also happen internally or externally on the network -- I'm sure they will spin it as an inside Dominion leaker provided the packets as part of a internal audit.
This way Dominion can't scream foul play.
They're super de duper fucked.
Frank said they had a sniffer program running that collected in real time.
Not only that white hats cloned the entire Dominion/Scytl network they got everything.
Do you have the clip of this? I would love to hear the full clip, it would give some idea.
I vaguely remember last year there being something going on about all internet traffic being captured and reviewed. I'll have to dig and circle back.
Dennis Montgomery, the whistleblower who built THE HAMMER program for foreign surveillance was in the news during the Out of the Shadows documentary.
Obama had commandeered the HAMMER and tuned it against Americans. So every internet traffic gets sent via HAMMER and an AI decides whether to keep any of the packets for further review in future.
That may have been what i was reading. Seems right.
Just found something that blew my mind. Check this hit piece on the symposium: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/aug/11/mike-lindells-lead-cyber-expert-says-they-cant-pro/
(Ignore all the smears they start off with, and search for HAMMER)
These people are reporting that this data indeed came from HAMMER and was provided to Lindell by Montgomery, who apparently had a stroke the day before the symposium. I am getting goosebumps.
Yes, this is fake news article, but why are they talking about Hammer? We were just speculating this very thing independantly. They claim that Hammer is a conspiracy theory and at the same time, say the data came from there.
LOT more going on here.