How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible?...
How did Q Predict Mike Lindell’s Cyber Symposium 3 years ago, TO THE DAY?...
How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible?...
This is highly impossible — unless the plans were prepared many, MANY years ago!...
FUTURE PROVES PAST...
So here's an example: Watch the Water.
What does that mean? Who knows?
Just off the top of my head, "watch the water" has been murmured in relation to Charles Flynn, the Evergiven, the hospital ships off the coast, Puerto Rico, Taiwan, tweets from the Navy, flooding in Europe, and even the Texas ice storm, where someone here suggested it might refer to frozen water.
All Q gave us was the prediction that somewhere on the 70% of this planet that is water, something will happen, at some point in the future. Or, maybe in a sink or a bathtub. Or maybe it needs to be decoded more esoterically.
"Watch the water" means whatever is convenient. And when that doesn't pan out with a Deep State arrest, it gets memory holed.
But it still counts as a potential Q prediction, and is kept in your back pocket.
"Watch the water" predictions make up a pretty good chunk of what used to get discussed around here, and it still comes up whenever literally anything wet shows up in the news.
Each time it's cited, it feels like a victory. Maybe the Evergiven will eventually pan out. Maybe Charles Flynn will lead the military to reinstate Trump. Maybe maybe maybe.
And when I point out how you guys are just shotgunning this prediction at everything, the response I've gotten was that Q talks in multiple timelines, and that it can apply to multiple events. Because Q apparently doesn't talk in linear time.
Now, can you even imagine exactly what kind of an equation would be necessary to do math on this? We already have a single input with multiple unconfirmed outputs, which mathematically makes this a non-function equation, which already pretty much kills our ability to do any real statistical math with it. Beyond that, we have to take into account the possibility that we can twist this to not even mean water, not even mean watch, maybe it's all letter-substituted and is code for something else...
That's a non-falsifiable assertion.
I've watched Q stuff for a long time, and the only popular sayings of his are non-falsifiable. The ones that ARE falsifiable haven't panned out (like his first). Those are the only ones we can actually take data on, because there was a fail condition on whether or not Clinton would be indicted.
There is no fail condition on "watch the water."
Also, quantum equations are math. Literal college students do equations with quanta. It's not really as unreachable and unknowable as you're crediting it. Things that exist beyond math are generally considered religious, because even logical and philosophical arguments are often translated into mathematical expressions. Religion requires faith, and faith can exist safely beyond the reach of math.
And unless some shitty research is done (yes such too is done on GA,not everybody would be glad from thing I said) water would not be enough alone. "Watch the water" alone means "watch the water" (look for unusual things on the water).
Of course you and many people have law to be disappointed after some of anons fuck up researching sometimes. I really don't want to piss out people here more,so I would say only this: probably less than 10% things on GA are valid. Probably more than 10% are also purposeful deception done by maleficent people.But more than 0% for sure,and for me those more than 0% matters more than peoples fuckups. Fuckups are usually result of "picking" Q posts when we have only one or two coincidences together. But real Qincidences are like good (c)lock - opened by many simultaneous coincidences. There are such ones too.
We are unfortunately only people here.No supermen,no batman and so on on GA I guess...
Let's say... - how would you comment rather that: https://greatawakening.win/p/12jvuCphdi/codemonkeyz-just-confirmed/
By the way:
XD Math is language,physics is reality described by language. Not all equations with quanta have sense too... It is not faith but physical phenomena: there are rarely peaks of coincidences likewise peaks of high energy fluctuations.
So far, I haven’t seen any amassed coincidences that have been compelling. But, luckily, that doesn’t matter. Q comes with a deadline, even if people don’t agree on what it is or whether they should even look for it.
But it Trump gets back in office and all the Deep State arrested, Q was right, and I pledge to be here and let you take turns telling me that you were smarter than me.
If the Plan never materializes, then Q was wrong.
If you’re right, we’ll probably all know at once. If you’re wrong, people will drop off gradually. Either way, all I have to do to confirm this is wait and see what happens.
Enjoy the show, right?
Eh, it's more about Reddit shutting down subs that allow the propagation of election fraud and Q claims. I personally haven't banned anyone merely for being a Q supporter, but there's a reason that you guys pretty much only have here to hang out. Blame Reddit if you want. If I could curate a neutral space, I would.