Apply this logic to a Nazi soldier that is supposed to lead a Jewish child to a gas chamber. Is he less trustworthy if allows the child to break free and run to safety? The child doesn't really have an idea of what is about to happen to him/her. They just get to live another day. Is that so bad? Especially now that world is finally waking up to knowledge that pedes here have known for months: the vaxx is at best life with a compromised immune system and at worst a death sentence.
I am all for saving lives, just not by way of deception. Further, these patients who have been deceived, will likely never come to our side now, since in their eyes we are untrustworthy.
So is it bad what she did, maybe not if someone is saved, but is it morally wrong to deceive, even for the right reason? I say yes.
no downdoot for you.
Apply this logic to a Nazi soldier that is supposed to lead a Jewish child to a gas chamber. Is he less trustworthy if allows the child to break free and run to safety? The child doesn't really have an idea of what is about to happen to him/her. They just get to live another day. Is that so bad? Especially now that world is finally waking up to knowledge that pedes here have known for months: the vaxx is at best life with a compromised immune system and at worst a death sentence.
I am all for saving lives, just not by way of deception. Further, these patients who have been deceived, will likely never come to our side now, since in their eyes we are untrustworthy.
So is it bad what she did, maybe not if someone is saved, but is it morally wrong to deceive, even for the right reason? I say yes.