I am not a lawyer so the legalese escapes me. I have also not followed the docket enough to figure out what orders they refer to in their letters.
They represent a non-party John Doe, which I guess means not someone Giuffre is suing for defamation. I’m likely crazy but I think it’s Trump.
It appears the brief is for speeding the process up, but I’m not a lawyer. He reaffirms that the court should publish its opinion on a motion it’s been mulling for a few months, and that all parties that haven’t responded to orders to unseal have been given more than enough notice to make their objections known. They also state that redactions aren’t that hard and shouldn’t take that long since you can just find a name and search by the index to redact each case.
I am not a lawyer so the legalese escapes me. I have also not followed the docket enough to figure out what orders they refer to in their letters.
They represent a non-party John Doe, which I guess means not someone Giuffre is suing for defamation. I’m likely crazy but I think it’s Trump.
It appears the brief is for speeding the process up, but I’m not a lawyer. He reaffirms that the court should publish its opinion on a motion it’s been mulling for a few months, and that all parties that haven’t responded to orders to unseal have been given more than enough notice to make their objections known. They also state that redactions aren’t that hard and shouldn’t take that long since you can just find a name and search by the index to redact each case.