He won all 6 swing states, removing 95 electoral votes from Biden and adding them to Trump. BOOM. Resident in Chief is not the President.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
One thing that confuses/frustrates me about Mike.
He sorta dismisses all of the mail in fraud. Many many times he’s said, “it couldn’t be the mail in it could only be by the computers (digital)”
IT CAN BE BOTH MIKE
It's a lawyer/debate tactic. If you can clearly prove your main point with only X, sometimes it is counterproductive to focus on X and Y. Especially if the topic is complex.
Not to mention, if you focus on x and y and they can shed doubt on y they can essentially remove your credibility for both x and y.
exactly right
I’m not saying he needs to focus on X and Y.
His expertise (and data he has) relates to the digital realm. = X
But do not dismiss or discredit the massive mail in fraud. = Y
But then normies say "mail in fraud never happens, I told you that pillow dude was a moron."
It appears that this is to make the case that : a) There was technological manipulation b) There was a national security attack c) Trump was the victim d) He would be president on that impact alone.
With that you have defacto proven treason, which means that when you look at Y, you are no longer charged with "voter fraud" you are charged with "collaborating with the enemy".
Not X or Y! Only Q
it is counterproductive to focus on X and Y
Exactly, simplicity. If X nails it, nail it with X. If X is weak use Y and maybe Z too.
He didn't look into that and he said as much. He's only looking at the cyber stuff but admits the organic stuff needs addressed too.
Mike is a businessman. He knows by now that the mail in proof is a tougher road to prove, even if we all know it happened. The algorithms that predict each county with a 6th order polynomial… THAT shit is interesting and compelling for normies