He won all 6 swing states, removing 95 electoral votes from Biden and adding them to Trump. BOOM. Resident in Chief is not the President.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
It's a lawyer/debate tactic. If you can clearly prove your main point with only X, sometimes it is counterproductive to focus on X and Y. Especially if the topic is complex.
Not to mention, if you focus on x and y and they can shed doubt on y they can essentially remove your credibility for both x and y.
exactly right
I’m not saying he needs to focus on X and Y.
His expertise (and data he has) relates to the digital realm. = X
But do not dismiss or discredit the massive mail in fraud. = Y
But then normies say "mail in fraud never happens, I told you that pillow dude was a moron."
It appears that this is to make the case that : a) There was technological manipulation b) There was a national security attack c) Trump was the victim d) He would be president on that impact alone.
With that you have defacto proven treason, which means that when you look at Y, you are no longer charged with "voter fraud" you are charged with "collaborating with the enemy".
Not X or Y! Only Q
it is counterproductive to focus on X and Y
Exactly, simplicity. If X nails it, nail it with X. If X is weak use Y and maybe Z too.