It might be true that a true GMO can be patented, even a human. However, there is no evidence that supports the idea that the mRNA vaccine alters your DNA in any meaningful way. That's just not how it works. Now, if the mRNA vaccine has OTHER things in it that aren't listed, then it becomes more possible, but even then it would only be in a small percentage of the bodies cells, in which case like 0.00001% of you would be subject to the patents (plus they would be liable for a genetic attack, which is a crime against humanity).
At that point, who cares if they claim ownership.
The truth is, they technically already own you (if you allow them to claim it). You are, by law, a debt slave to the Federal Reserve. However, I think you can claim your inalienable right to be sovereign (within our legal system). I am still working on that evidence chain, but I think it leads there.
It might be true that a true GMO can be patented, even a human. However, there is no evidence that supports the idea that the mRNA vaccine alters your DNA in any meaningful way. That's just not how it works. Now, if the mRNA vaccine has OTHER things in it that aren't listed, then it becomes more possible, but even then it would only be in a small percentage of the bodies cells, in which case like 0.00001% of you would be subject to the patents (plus they would be liable for a genetic attack, which is a crime against humanity).
At that point, who cares if they claim ownership.
The truth is, they technically already own you (if you allow them to claim it). You are, by law, a debt slave to the Federal Reserve. However, I think you can claim your inalienable right to be sovereign (within our legal system). I am still working on that evidence chain, but I think it leads there.