The 4.2% ratio sounds suspicious to me. I hope the data that Pillow Guy possesses are real packet captures, not fake data. It is possible that the black hats interloped with Mike Lindell's 'Red Team' and injected fake packets that resulted in the uniform 4.2% loss in order to make the Pillow Conference look bad.
I think that reality is more likely than the cheaters deciding to steal 4.2% from every single state.
At this time I am thinking Mike should have had Dr Shiva as one of his team members inspecting all of this data beforehand. We shall see. It is also possible that this was dropped so that the MSM amplifies the symposium more than they would have before. If they think they "got him!" it will be hard for them to keep their mouths shut.
Bannon likes to describe his process as the ground game and that Mike is the air game. It is similar to an actual battle in war. You send in the air planes first to soften up the targets, then you send your ground forces in to mop up.
I believe strongly that the forensic audits will be the place we uncover the most provable fraud. Thanks to states like Texas jumping in today with audits, the ground game will cross the country at the precinct and county level and this is where the fraud needs to be uncovered the most. The more local the better. It makes it more personal for every single voter. People will realize their own votes were stolen and it wasn't just something that happened "way over there."
At this time I am thinking Mike should have had Dr Shiva as one of his team members inspecting all of this data beforehand
I think that the Red Team (Waldron etc.) inspected the data for the past 2 weeks. But the problem is they either made up the data, black hats injected fake data during their analysis, or the data they got back in January was garbage all along.
We still haven't seen the real Election Day PCAP's and an explanation of how they calculated the numbers from yesterday. So far, all we saw was a mock election done by the Red Team with SQL Server injecting fake votes.
Dr Shiva
I don't completely trust Dr. Shiva. He does not like Donald Trump due to the Trump campaign not caring about his Senate election lawsuit. But that being said, I love hearing from people who I don't fully agree with.
If they think they "got him!"
You may be right. Pillow Guy could've made sure the symposium had issues on purpose in order to distract the MSM.
Mike is the air game
Adding to this analogy, what happened yesterday is like Mike Lindell not filling the planes with enough fuel to reach the targets. Who knows, he might've done that on purpose so that the enemy wastes their rockets.
I believe strongly that the forensic audits will be the place we uncover the most provable fraud
I definitely agree. However, we need to make sure that the 'forensic audits' are real audits like Maricopa or at least as rigorous as when the IRS audits taxes. We need to beware of sham audits like the New Hampshire one. I'm suspicious of TX because of the RINO influence in that state. They could simply do a quick, cheap audit to try to satisfy us, rather than opening all the books.
Mike Lindell claimed that he thinks one of his cyber experts was a CIA infiltrator. He also claimed over the past two days that the livestream as well as the CodeMonkeyZ video chat suffered from cyber attacks.
We'll have to let the dust settle over the next few days. I'm not going to judge anybody for now.
So if the publicly available registration data showed anomalies in which the same percentage of age groups voted in each county, why is it so unlikely that each state was stolen by 4.2%? it just looks like they didn't think they'd get caught?
Appreciate the responses as I'm trying to understand things.
I thought Dr. Frank showed that for every county in a given state, the age distribution matched? That doesn't mean that age distributions between states matched. He did say a few months ago that the "keys" were slightly different depending on the state.
I don't know why the cheaters would steal the same ratio of votes in each state. I would expect them to steal MO by 2%, but PA by 10%, for example.
Or maybe the cheaters had to make the results look similar to past elections in order to not get caught? Maybe they needed the red states to be as red as usual and the blue states to still be blue?
The 4.2% ratio sounds suspicious to me. I hope the data that Pillow Guy possesses are real packet captures, not fake data. It is possible that the black hats interloped with Mike Lindell's 'Red Team' and injected fake packets that resulted in the uniform 4.2% loss in order to make the Pillow Conference look bad.
I think that reality is more likely than the cheaters deciding to steal 4.2% from every single state.
At this time I am thinking Mike should have had Dr Shiva as one of his team members inspecting all of this data beforehand. We shall see. It is also possible that this was dropped so that the MSM amplifies the symposium more than they would have before. If they think they "got him!" it will be hard for them to keep their mouths shut.
Bannon likes to describe his process as the ground game and that Mike is the air game. It is similar to an actual battle in war. You send in the air planes first to soften up the targets, then you send your ground forces in to mop up.
I believe strongly that the forensic audits will be the place we uncover the most provable fraud. Thanks to states like Texas jumping in today with audits, the ground game will cross the country at the precinct and county level and this is where the fraud needs to be uncovered the most. The more local the better. It makes it more personal for every single voter. People will realize their own votes were stolen and it wasn't just something that happened "way over there."
I think that the Red Team (Waldron etc.) inspected the data for the past 2 weeks. But the problem is they either made up the data, black hats injected fake data during their analysis, or the data they got back in January was garbage all along.
We still haven't seen the real Election Day PCAP's and an explanation of how they calculated the numbers from yesterday. So far, all we saw was a mock election done by the Red Team with SQL Server injecting fake votes.
I don't completely trust Dr. Shiva. He does not like Donald Trump due to the Trump campaign not caring about his Senate election lawsuit. But that being said, I love hearing from people who I don't fully agree with.
You may be right. Pillow Guy could've made sure the symposium had issues on purpose in order to distract the MSM.
Adding to this analogy, what happened yesterday is like Mike Lindell not filling the planes with enough fuel to reach the targets. Who knows, he might've done that on purpose so that the enemy wastes their rockets.
I definitely agree. However, we need to make sure that the 'forensic audits' are real audits like Maricopa or at least as rigorous as when the IRS audits taxes. We need to beware of sham audits like the New Hampshire one. I'm suspicious of TX because of the RINO influence in that state. They could simply do a quick, cheap audit to try to satisfy us, rather than opening all the books.
All great thoughts portinan. Thanks for your insights.
Mike Lindell claimed that he thinks one of his cyber experts was a CIA infiltrator. He also claimed over the past two days that the livestream as well as the CodeMonkeyZ video chat suffered from cyber attacks.
We'll have to let the dust settle over the next few days. I'm not going to judge anybody for now.
Question, was it Lindel's data or public election data that had the same percentage of each age group voting? I'm not sure..
That was the data Dr. Frank collected from publicly available voter registration databases from each state. It's unrelated to packet captures.
So if the publicly available registration data showed anomalies in which the same percentage of age groups voted in each county, why is it so unlikely that each state was stolen by 4.2%? it just looks like they didn't think they'd get caught?
Appreciate the responses as I'm trying to understand things.
I thought Dr. Frank showed that for every county in a given state, the age distribution matched? That doesn't mean that age distributions between states matched. He did say a few months ago that the "keys" were slightly different depending on the state.
I don't know why the cheaters would steal the same ratio of votes in each state. I would expect them to steal MO by 2%, but PA by 10%, for example.
Or maybe the cheaters had to make the results look similar to past elections in order to not get caught? Maybe they needed the red states to be as red as usual and the blue states to still be blue?