He's been advertising for months that he has these PCAPS and he was going to show them to us this week. If you really had absolute proof of a crime, would you advertise that you had them before they were made public? I think not. Perhaps what he has is not PCAPS but something completely different and he's been sending blackhats on a wild goose chase for months looking for PCAPS.
Perhaps the data that he showed us with the before and after server images are the goods we should be focusing on. He has an elected county official that stands by them and is a witness to the coverup. What if those images are enough to prove that fraud occurred? Maybe CO will be the first state to decertify their election. That would be a hoot.
Tina Peters is a hero. She was not afraid, she knows she's right and she was fearless.
I agree that this image from Mesa is not the final goods. But I believe that we should be focusing on those images rather than bemoaning that we didn't get PCAPs. That was the point I was trying to make but perhaps not very well :)
The fact that one county clerk has come forward is a big deal, I doubt she is the only one.
I see your point now, and I agree with it!
By now we should be smart enough to know that everything we see has an element of disinformation for the benefit of [DS] and hence we shouldnt get disappointed for not getting what was “promised”.
Honestly I was very down today, and even started making a post about how it did not deliver on the promise, but I stepped away for something and when I came back, no longer felt so down - as I was thinking about the whole picture.