DURHAM: New Article in WSJ this Morning. His Report was Expected by the End of this Summer
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
Agreed. Herridge just tweeted about his report needing to be in a form that can be disseminated to the public again, and what do you know? When you Google Durham you see the WSJ article was published about 7 minutes after her tweet.
The article contradicts itself by saying he has brought evidence to a grand jury and then asserting he won’t be bringing criminal charges against anyone. Seems dumb to bring anything to a GJ if he’s not charging people.
The most interesting thing I found was that I guess he has to submit something to the AG every year to keep his budget going. I guess that’s why they are saying they would’ve expected something by the end of summer/September as Garland would decide on his budget for the next year this October.
Per Wikipedia:
“As of 2018, these regulations remain in effect in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 28, part 600 (28 CFR §600).[6] The regulations restrict the power to fire the special counsel into the hands of the attorney general alone, and they forbid the firing of the special counsel without good cause. They are internal Department of Justice regulations deriving their power from various acts of Congress, such as U.S. Code, Title 28, section 510 (28 U.S.C. 510).[20] Congress has the power to directly limit the firing of special counsels or to delegate that power to the Attorney General. An agency regulation promulgated within the authority granted by statute has the force and effect of law, is binding upon the body that issues it, and can't be arbitrarily revoked.[13]”
It’s a pretty interesting read tbh
My opinion is that Durham is using the threat of actually charging people for their crimes, if those people refuse to pay him an extortion fee. He wants bribe money, because he is nothing more than a filthy republican party establishment swamp rat.
He can bring evidence to a grand jury to show that he has the ammunition to lock them away, collect a bribe, and drop the charges. Rinse, repeat, profit. Swampy as fuck. And every day this fucker lurks in the shadows, outside the light of transparency, my suspicions about him grow stronger. He is controlled by the (R) party half of the swamp, and the swamp abhors truth and justice above all else.
Maybe.
Anyone who exposes the FBI for framing innocent men for murder, gets convictions for corrupted FBI handlers, and catches corrupt governors seems more like a white hat than a black hat, IMO.