HCQ has been known for decades to cure and prevent some viruses. Some question it, but before the propaganda started, there actually were diligent scientists and doctors. This was before the corruption and propaganda started. 2005 timeframe.
(media.greatawakening.win)
ℹ️ ⚔️ Information Warfare ⚔️ ℹ️
That’s interesting. But does anyone know why the FLCCC is saying that HCQ was subsequently found to be almost ineffective and therefore de-adopted?
Source. See section that says “ Isn’t the promotion of ivermectin the same thing as hydroxychloroquine – everyone claims it works when all the randomized controlled trials showed it didn’t?”
HCQ was not de-adopted entirely.
" In keeping with Declaration 37, immediately after the widespread adoption of HCQ, studies were immediately conducted by many centers. Unfortunately, all of the RCT’s reported negative results which led to rapid de-adoption** with the exception of sporadic continued use in early phase disease.**"
In other words, they found HCQ largely ineffective for patients in advanced stages of covid infection, but HCQ still showed benefit when administered in early stages.
You can find additional information about HCQ early treatment vs late treatment effectiveness here: https://hcqmeta.com/
Thanks! I guess the language of it being 'sporadic use in early phase' kind of made me think it had been mostly considered a write-off.
If any treatment was effective, the EUA for the vaccines are invalid. Moderna made 18.7 billion last year, they will probably exceed that amount this year. Pfizer numbers are similar. You can buy off a lot of folks with that kind of money. We all know that big corporations can sometimes do terrible things for profit. I think this is one of those cases. The folks promoting the pharma may have a totally different agenda, but the money buys the minions.