HCQ has been known for decades to cure and prevent some viruses. Some question it, but before the propaganda started, there actually were diligent scientists and doctors. This was before the corruption and propaganda started. 2005 timeframe.
(media.greatawakening.win)
ℹ️ ⚔️ Information Warfare ⚔️ ℹ️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
What he said is true, but if he goes to the source document there are a number of further studies linked to it. There are also a huge number of studies outside the US that are clinically tested in vivo. The point is that this was known decades ago and was tested extensively after the 2002 outbreak of the first big Corona type virus that became a pandemic. The study in Oxford (that was used to justify banning the use of HCQ) in May 2020 that was cited for heart complications and death was by a doctor's trial where he exceeded the maximum recommended dose of 200mg per day and delivered a fatal dose of 2500mg. Severe side effects were established at 1500mg. The dosing and side effects have been well documented for over 70 years. Looking at one study and not further researching is very narrow minded, because it is being used in multiple countries throughout the world and their numbers are substantially lower than ours. I understand this is classified as anecdotal evidence, however anecdotal evidence becomes overwhelming evidence. The problem of trained scientists today, is that they have been rigidly trained to have an inflexible protocol that is simply ridiculous. They are lost in their own dogma. When you see something happening all the time, you don't say it isnt really happening because science hasn't tested it in laboratory conditions, you test it in controlled laboratory conditions to figure out all the how's and why's. I work in a laboratory. I know test protocol, just not medical. The protocols are universal for testing. Controlling variables to isolate the characteristics that are of concern.