"Poor" Thomas Wictor being called "Qanon" by Mike Rothschild even though he derides us while believing what we believe about Trump - Oh the irony
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧠 These people are stupid!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
What is 'Qanon' saying about devolution? Patel Patriot wrote his Devolution series which has been well received by Q followers, but he doesn't represent 'Qanon' any more than anybody else does.
It's bizarre because Mike Rothschild mentions Wictor in a hit piece about 'Qanon' devolution conspiracy theories, and he loses his mind, threatening legal action and uses that to once again attack 'Qanon', just like Rothschild.
Infact from what I can read, Thomas is more angry that Mike called him "Qanon" rather than anything else he said.
Clearly he has no idea of what Q is, and initially when I tried to engage him about this he banned me. I used to go back there because the community there is so ripe for redpilling. But everytime I redpill someone I get banned.
I got banned for posting about GME. I got banned for posting that SARS-Cov-2 was created in lab. I got banned for talking about deep state. And finally I got banned when I pointed this out to Saul when he talked about deep state. At this point, it wasnt fun anymore so now I just go there for the memes.
Dude, I got banned for contrasting the Hoover Institution's Kneeling for BLM and lack of interest in prosecuting Antifa/BLM rioters and arsonists, with their elan and gusto to the point of interviewing coworkers, of people who merely attended 1/6.
SMB didn't like it much, I got banned without a single warning.
Yeah, there is something about SMB that I dont like. Almost feels like SMB is a handler for TW and carefully corrals what TW says out to public. The whole quodverum stinks to high heavens of some kinda sophisticated psyop. I am not saying TW is willing participant in this, but that they are carefully controlling him to get the effect they want.
Me too. He presented a speech based on his writings, blaming Columbine Mass Shooting on Evangelical Christians. Most of his life was spent either as a UN/NGO Bureaucrat or writing newsletters for Gold Investment type stuff. He's an opinionated Argentine (I've lived there, and the stereotype is more true than false) who thinks his worldview and opinions are fact and all else is in error.
If you want to be insta-banned, you can also bring up Eugenics, which was pushed by liberal "Churches" and Socialists in the USA in the 1910s-1950s; where Margaret Sanger frequently stumped for speeches ad money.
I enjoy TW even if I don't always agree, but SMB is not my bag.