I was having trouble understanding this transcript of your acute aphasia incident, but I think I picked out the gist.
You're saying, you don't have to provide any proof of your ideas. They are good ideas but when they are questioned ideas then the questioner is a shill.
I'm no shill. In fact, I'm relatively certain that absolutely no alphabet agents are interested in decoding the emotionally charged feelings journals you post.
I tried to teach you but I triggered you. Sorry, fren. You seem a little scared and unbalanced. I don't like to recommend Big Pharma, so I suggest you consider chewing some Valerian root.
This guy is an obvious shill troll. You need only click his name and look at his history. I've run in to him a couple times now and had some laughs because I inadvertently shut him down before I knew he was a troll.
You have received the message, but you make a straw man then tell me to praise it. You misstate my claim.
As to your very specific claims, when you are serious about them you will provide the "sauce" that proves them. I cannot supply you with sauce for your own notions.
You seem to have knowledge of the inner workings of Q. We simply crave your sauces to explain how you know Ron Watkins' role in the things he does? Or in the identity of those who work with Ron? Or on the roles and jobs assigned to whom by whom? There is much to cover with your delectable sauce, but you provide none. Why do you withhold your sauces?
I was having trouble understanding this transcript of your acute aphasia incident, but I think I picked out the gist.
You're saying, you don't have to provide any proof of your ideas. They are good ideas but when they are questioned ideas then the questioner is a shill.
I'm no shill. In fact, I'm relatively certain that absolutely no alphabet agents are interested in decoding the emotionally charged feelings journals you post.
I tried to teach you but I triggered you. Sorry, fren. You seem a little scared and unbalanced. I don't like to recommend Big Pharma, so I suggest you consider chewing some Valerian root.
🤣🤣🤣
Thank you for playing. 😘
I certainly prefer these succinct replies, but I am curious why your emoji suggest you frantically weeping and laughing and attempting to kiss me!
When you are little calmer, look back over my words to find more fruitful avenues of research. I will be standing by, ready to help when you need me.
I need your help to explain to me why YOU, think CodeMonkeyZ is Q.
This guy is an obvious shill troll. You need only click his name and look at his history. I've run in to him a couple times now and had some laughs because I inadvertently shut him down before I knew he was a troll.
You have received the message, but you make a straw man then tell me to praise it. You misstate my claim.
As to your very specific claims, when you are serious about them you will provide the "sauce" that proves them. I cannot supply you with sauce for your own notions.
Where is your "sauce", my saucy fellow??
You seem to have knowledge of the inner workings of Q. We simply crave your sauces to explain how you know Ron Watkins' role in the things he does? Or in the identity of those who work with Ron? Or on the roles and jobs assigned to whom by whom? There is much to cover with your delectable sauce, but you provide none. Why do you withhold your sauces?