I'm a younger generation, now? Funny how your bias blinds you to the truth.
Women aren't inherently more corruptible, but the Marxist movement uses the social wedge of feminism to protect their corrupt pawns. 'You only say that because it's a woman.' Or 'not white' 'not English' and all of the other such bullshit.
Most of history has shown that the "-ism" used to corrupt is whatever finds purchase. More recently, for every Nancy Pelosi, I can find you at least one Chuck Schumer. To say that Pelosi was more easily corrupted is a reflection of your own indoctrination.
Thid is getting laughable. More ad hominems and projection. At least you've grown to include emotional rants since you can't win on logic. Care to bingo a fourth rule, my Alinsky wannabe?
Demanding I accept feminism's ideals so you can decry them is patently ridiculous. Please answer for why men are as much or more so corrupted in politics. You stated the answer amid your cry to support feminism, so you are halfway there.
Sinve you are going to go back, once again, to sports, what about the tyranny who was shown up at the Olympics by real women? I'm sure he doesn't count because of an internal rule that obviates your need to self reflect on your beliefs. If you are earnest, you pay attention to outliers that confirm your indoctrination and nothing else. If you aren't earnest, you're just following a (terrible) script.
Oh goody. Bereft of original ideas, all you can do is hurl more ad hominems, double down, and turn into a grammar nazi - and then you fail at grammar and bbcode while doing so.
You still have addressed no points I've made, instead relying on stroking your ego at every opportunity.
You expose yourself as a biased and wholly indoctrinated individual at every turn, refusing the easiest colloquial debate. I await your next spittle-laden emotional melt down and ego masturbation session.
I'm a younger generation, now? Funny how your bias blinds you to the truth.
Women aren't inherently more corruptible, but the Marxist movement uses the social wedge of feminism to protect their corrupt pawns. 'You only say that because it's a woman.' Or 'not white' 'not English' and all of the other such bullshit.
Most of history has shown that the "-ism" used to corrupt is whatever finds purchase. More recently, for every Nancy Pelosi, I can find you at least one Chuck Schumer. To say that Pelosi was more easily corrupted is a reflection of your own indoctrination.
Thid is getting laughable. More ad hominems and projection. At least you've grown to include emotional rants since you can't win on logic. Care to bingo a fourth rule, my Alinsky wannabe?
Demanding I accept feminism's ideals so you can decry them is patently ridiculous. Please answer for why men are as much or more so corrupted in politics. You stated the answer amid your cry to support feminism, so you are halfway there.
Sinve you are going to go back, once again, to sports, what about the tyranny who was shown up at the Olympics by real women? I'm sure he doesn't count because of an internal rule that obviates your need to self reflect on your beliefs. If you are earnest, you pay attention to outliers that confirm your indoctrination and nothing else. If you aren't earnest, you're just following a (terrible) script.
Oh goody. Bereft of original ideas, all you can do is hurl more ad hominems, double down, and turn into a grammar nazi - and then you fail at grammar and bbcode while doing so.
You still have addressed no points I've made, instead relying on stroking your ego at every opportunity.
You expose yourself as a biased and wholly indoctrinated individual at every turn, refusing the easiest colloquial debate. I await your next spittle-laden emotional melt down and ego masturbation session.