The Electric Universe Theory has never been censored.
The "theory" (and I use that word loosely) simply never produced a concrete mathematical model that can be peer reviewed. If the Electric Universe ever rises to a genuine scientific hypothesis, (namely that it make predictions that can be falsified, and it does so in a way at least as good as the existing standard model) it will definitely be published. Physicists are always looking for things that our existing models can not explain. Even something as minor as the g-2 anomaly sent waves of excitement throughout the world. Anything that might give us a new direction is welcomed, not censored. The Electric Universe simply isn't good science.
It is disingenuous to say bad science is equivalent to censorship.
The Electric Universe Theory has never been censored.
The "theory" (and I use that word loosely) simply never produced a concrete mathematical model that can be peer reviewed. If the Electric Universe ever rises to a genuine scientific hypothesis, (namely that it make predictions that can be falsified, and it does so in a way at least as good as the existing standard model) it will definitely be published. Physicists are always looking for things that our existing models can not explain. Even something as minor as the g-2 anomaly sent waves of excitement throughout the world. Anything that might give us a new direction is welcomed, not censored. The Electric Universe simply isn't good science.
It is disingenuous to say bad science is equivalent to censorship.
Uh, Velikovsky's textbook is the only textbook ever banned by Scholastic, its distributor.
Do your homework.