So 3:33 -

It's not even a crazy fomula, Steve - it's just they subtracted 4.2 percent. So my conclusion on this is something very simple: either this whole thing is a hoax, disinformation to try to actually take away the real substantive issues of election fraud like ballot images, etcetera. It's the biggest disinformation campaign being done using a very wonderful man... Or that there's a bunch of nerds out there who simply said "we're gonna just subtract votes by 4.2%" That's what the difference is. So either it's a hoax, or people read the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.

4:50 -

It's a perfect line, Mike. This is either completely impossible, or it's a hoax to do disinformation to make this thing look completely bogus - and that's what the nuance here is.

5:50 -

There is a real election fraud taking place. There is likely a set of people who want to blur that - those in power are not that stupid - so in order to do that, they may do some outrageous stuff, to put out something like this to hide the real issues, so we don't talk about ballot images being destroyed, we don't talk about what occurred in Suffolk County, Massachusetts, and we have to take that into account...

6:20

I'm saying this is evidence of a potential disinformation campaign.

So Mike Lindell was being set up with false evidence, and white hats (Shiva included) caught that evidence before it was presented, and is calling the hoax a hoax, during the presentation of said hoax?

So we're looking at hoax-ception?