Oh I have no idea if he is right about them, but you have to admit it is kind of interesting to think about.
Nuclear armament has been the central theme of geopolitics since Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Cold War, the spread of Communism. Cuba, North Korea, China, Israel. All the major players just happened to figure out the tech for this thing that had never been done before 1945, and we've been in a worldwide stalemate ever since under the guise of "mutually assured destruction".
What if it was all bullshit? What if Hiroshima and Nagasaki were massive firebombing campaigns re-branded as "nuclear" so that the powers that be had an unthinkably powerful weapon by which to keep all the peons in their place, when it is actually blackmail evidence of all these corrupt shitbags fucking kids, and so it is really THEM who is being controlled, and we're all just paying the price?
If they can make nuclear power portable, why can't we build much smaller nuclear reactors to provide more electrical energy to more people so we can stop our reliance on oil and gas and "green" sources? Why do we have "nuclear" submarines (covert vehicles), but we haven't made any other ships in the fleet, or trains, or tanks, or planes, or aerospace rockets nuclear?
I dunno, man. I don't think he's necessarily right about everything with it, but it is a pretty compelling case that there is SOMETHING fishy with nuclear as we currently think of it.
Maybe he is right about some stuff I was just talking about nukes though
Oh I have no idea if he is right about them, but you have to admit it is kind of interesting to think about.
Nuclear armament has been the central theme of geopolitics since Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Cold War, the spread of Communism. Cuba, North Korea, China, Israel. All the major players just happened to figure out the tech for this thing that had never been done before 1945, and we've been in a worldwide stalemate ever since under the guise of "mutually assured destruction".
What if it was all bullshit? What if Hiroshima and Nagasaki were massive firebombing campaigns re-branded as "nuclear" so that the powers that be had an unthinkably powerful weapon by which to keep all the peons in their place, when it is actually blackmail evidence of all these corrupt shitbags fucking kids, and so it is really THEM who is being controlled, and we're all just paying the price?
If they can make nuclear power portable, why can't we build much smaller nuclear reactors to provide more electrical energy to more people so we can stop our reliance on oil and gas and "green" sources? Why do we have "nuclear" submarines (covert vehicles), but we haven't made any other ships in the fleet, or trains, or tanks, or planes, or aerospace rockets nuclear?
I dunno, man. I don't think he's necessarily right about everything with it, but it is a pretty compelling case that there is SOMETHING fishy with nuclear as we currently think of it.